Chess / In a tangle on the world wide web

William Hartston
Wednesday 06 December 1995 19:02 EST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Garry Kasparov gave a clock simultaneous display on Tuesday: playing 10 opponents on 10 boards, under normal conditions with clocks. Kasparov, darting from board to board, had one hour for all his moves in all the games; his opponents had 45 minutes each. There's nothing unusual about that, except that he was in Munich and his 10 opponents - including England's 10-year-old superteeny Luke McShane, were scattered around the world in London, New York, Switzerland, India, Berlin, Israel, France and Denmark. The whole thing was conducted over the Internet and could, in theory, be followed by any web-literate chess fan.

So half an hour after the scheduled start, with a deft http://www.intel.com/, I was looking at the home page of Intel, the sponsors of the event, whence a quick mouse blip led me to the "virtual chess match". That's where it began to get a little confusing.

There was an on-screen button for game selection, followed by the names of Kasparov's 10 opponents, each with a blippable box by it. But should I blip the box, then the button, or the button then the box? And which of the four servers should I choose? I opted for "game select" "Luke McShane" and "Intel Europe" and after a brief wait, there appeared on the screen a picture of a chessboard in its starting position. A line of commentary, however, indicated that the game was well under way, so I pressed another server button. Up on the screen came this chessboard:

Luke, playing Black, was threatening Qg2 mate, and 1.Qxb8+ Kg7 2.Nf4 loses instantly to 2...Qxg3+. Was the champ facing a knock-out? Sadly not. I soon noticed 1.Qxb8+ Kg7 2.Kf2! when 2...Qg2+ 3.Ke1 gets White out of trouble. When trial and many errors had produced the correct combination of button presses to update the position, I deduced that Kasparov had followed my advice, and the game had continued 3...Bf3 4.Rxf3 Qxf3 5.Qf4 with a hopeless position for McShane.

Now more confident in my technological expertise, I blipped through the other games of the contest. A little guesswork was needed where the "select server" button obliterated several squares on White's back rank, but Kasparov seemed to be doing well.

Next time I looked, McShane had resigned. Kasparov ended with seven wins and three draws. At one moment I even tried a button promising a JPG image from a live camera in Munich, but it rudely told me I had an "unsupported SOF marker type Oxc2". Persevering with the GIF image button, I was soon looking at a blurred picture of someone's back. Not quite the image, as in the picture above, that I had hoped for. All in all, a fairly typical day on the Internet.

But do you think that blurred back on my computer screen might have been Kasparov himself?

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in