It’s time someone said it: charity walkers are bad for the environment

I don’t understand why people aren’t happy to go for a walk in their own time, and then send off a donation to the charity of their choice

Janet Street-Porter
Friday 28 September 2018 13:05 EDT
Comments
Walking challenges seriously affect both local inhabitants and the wild scenery that National Parks were set up to protect
Walking challenges seriously affect both local inhabitants and the wild scenery that National Parks were set up to protect (Getty/iStock)

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Walking in a group to raise money for a good cause has become increasingly popular, but what is the impact on fragile paths and remote moorlands?

It might sound churlish, but I don’t understand why people aren’t happy to go for a walk in their own time, and then send off a donation to the charity of their choice. It’s one thing to walk around a city park in the dark for a cancer charity, but when 100,000 people tackle the Three Peaks Challenge in the Yorkshire Dales all on the same day, it seriously affects both the local inhabitants, and the wild scenery our National Parks were set up to protect.

Some of the villages in the Yorkshire Dales have complained about “over-tourism” and they have a point. There are simply not enough toilets or parking spaces for the influx of visitors for a big event like this.

I cannot understand why visitors all want to hang out together – the Yorkshire Dales contains hundreds of miles of gorgeous paths, and yet most people want to stick to the well-signposted famous trails. Unfortunately, once a walk has a name tag and a guidebook, it attracts about five times as many people as before. Go a couple of miles down the road and you can enjoy solitude with only the birds and sheep for company.

The Yorkshire Three Peaks Challenge, where participants climb Whernside, Ingleborough and Pen-y-ghent, raises £6m for charity – but couldn’t this be achieved in a more environmentally friendly way?

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in