Captain Moonlight: Photographic ethics

Helen Fielding
Saturday 26 March 1994 19:02 EST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

BIG MOVIES, big hair, and the Americans are getting so big on ethics in news photography that an AP picture of Socks, the Clintons' cat, sitting on the White House podium, recently went out with an 'advisor', explaining that the cat's minder had actually placed the cat on the podium, lest readers be duped into believing that the world-famous pet had climbed there of its own accord. A resourceful Florida news snapper who painted a team logo on the soles of a sports fan's shoes, and then took a picture of him with his feet up, was sacked.

Not so here. On 9 March several papers carried a picture of a grim-faced man carrying a box draped in black out of the Gloucester 'House of Death', while a policeman bowed his head sepulchrally. 'Human remains are carried from Cromwell Street,' drooled the captions. Actually, there weren't any human remains in the box at all. The whole thing had been laid on by the police to placate the frustrated snappers who hadn't had anything spooky to photograph for a while. 'We did it and decided whatever story they wanted to print was up to them,' the Gloucester Police told the British Journal of Photography.

(Photograph omitted)

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in