I don’t trust the Tories to lift a finger for our environment – but a Final Say referendum can reset the debate

Boris Johnson can afford not to live in an area that has hazardous levels of nitrogen dioxide. His wealth, at least temporarily, shields him from the harmful policies that they force upon everyone else

Nimo Omer
Saturday 06 July 2019 12:26 EDT
Comments
European Parliament votes to ban single-use plastics in bid to tackle pollution

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

We have pondered, pontificated, ummed and ahhed about what Brexit will do to our country’s economy, political infrastructure and our social cohesion. The topic has dominated headlines, conversations and the national consciousness for three years. But the truth is that none of this matters if we allow our world to burn.

The planet is on fire, and we are the pyromaniacs holding the flamethrower. It is choking and suffocating on our waste while we refuse to do anything about it.

By “we” I don’t mean Joe who doesn’t recycle as much as he should, or Sally who uses plastic straws. I mean the 100 companies who have been the source of more than 70 per cent of the world’s greenhouse gases since 1988. Unsurprisingly, it’s not the CEOs of these corporations who suffer the consequences of climate change. It is poor people, black and brown people, and marginalised communities who are bearing the burden. From the North East to the Midlands, it is the very communities that Brexiteers claimed to represent.

Inequality is perhaps the defining feature of our society, and environmental issues are inflected by the same issue. Just as a no-deal Brexit poses the biggest threat to the economic and social wellbeing of the poorest in society, crashing out of the EU means there will be no environmental protection framework rendering many vulnerable to even more hazardous living conditions.

And so, the almost comically apocalyptic environmental future that awaits us has been overshadowed by the unrelenting presence of Brexit in our political discourse. But in truth, the two issues are intimately linked. Both crises are symbols of the very wealthy, wreaking havoc and then insulating themselves while everyone else pays the price through life threatening health implications, uncertainty, and plummeting standards of living.

The architects of the Brexit project have always claimed to represent those forgotten by the changing nature of Britain. But will they remember those people when this government accelerates its policy of total contempt for any kind of environmental protection? Will they exhibit any remorse when constituents in Hickleton and Doncaster face even higher levels of nitrogen dioxide in the air they breathe? Air pollution has been linked to miscarriage, dementia and heart disease – is this a price worth paying?

The Conservative government has already done everything in its power to circumvent EU regulations. Whether that means failing to adequately deal with nitrogen dioxide levels or quietly eroding important environmental and human health protections. It’s clear they have no interest in environmental protection. With the gung-ho attitude championed by Boris Johnson encouraging a no-deal Brexit at every turn, the glaringly obvious contradiction of this whole farce shines through.

Johnson and Nigel Farage can afford not to live in an area that has hazardous levels of nitrogen dioxide. Their wealth, at least temporarily, shields them from the harmful policies that they force upon everyone else. This lack of foresight, and obsession with the now, is a defining feature of a culture that wants what it wants and wants it now, at any cost.

It’s clear that this isn’t even about the EU, it’s about our own government. Do we trust them to protect our environment? Do we trust them to robustly tackle the climate crisis that looms over our future? Do we trust them to put the needs of the most marginalised members of society first? I don’t. A no-deal Brexit not only threatens our political and economic institutions – it threatens everything.

Greta Thunberg; Extinction Rebellion; protests and climate strikes – there is an existential angst in public consciousness about the future of our country and planet. We must channel this angst into a viable positive vision of the future of this country, one where we aren’t being dragged into court every other year like naughty school children petulantly stomping into the headmaster’s office after intentionally breaking the rules for attention.

The irony of this metaphor isn’t lost on me: it is in fact children who have said “enough is enough”. Brexit, more than anything, has shone a harsh light our inane political structure, but our institutions have been defined by failure for the last decade. The kids have seen that the headmaster is a fool. When children as young as five are marching against the perilous future that awaits us, perhaps it is time to re-evaluate.

Support free-thinking journalism and attend Independent events

Mary Creagh, the chair of the parliamentary Environmental Audit Committee, has said: “If we want to be a world leader in environmental protection, we need a world-leading body to protect it.” The solution is clear. We must rule out no deal, and put any deal – one that protects the environment and battles climate change – back to the people, with an option to remain in the world-leading body of the EU.

It is the only legitimate way forward, one that unites people and starts a future where a unified environmental policy is as commonsensical as having mutual labour laws and health and safety regulations. Frankly, it’s time to put the flamethrower down.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in