As others see us: Videos

Saturday 16 April 1994 18:02 EDT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

POLITICALLY, the affair was quickly dealt with. In less than 15 minutes, the Home Secretary, Michael Howard, had defused the parliamentary 'bomb' which threatened to go off on Tuesday in the House of Commons. He persuaded David Alton, the Liberal Democrat who lit the touchpaper, to withdraw his amendment to the Criminal Justice Bill in favour of the Government's proposals. Mr Alton wanted to make it an offence for people to allow children to see violent videos which presented 'a dubious role model' or could cause 'psychological damage'.

Almost 250 MPs, of whom 80 were Conservatives, were prepared to support this initiative. This would have meant defeat for John Major's government, unthinkable in the midst of the Government's campaign for the local elections of 5 May, and at a time when the 'leadership crisis' still threatens Mr Major's position. But Mr Alton's amendment was so vaguely drawn up as to make the consequences too far-reaching.

Public opinion suggests there is a link between the behaviour of individuals and the spectacle that television provides (if not, why would advertisers spend such fortunes?) but specialists have always been divided on the question: does violence encourage violent behaviour? Child psychologists believe that children always identify with the perpetrators of violence, and never with their victims . . .

Le Monde, French daily

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in