ANOTHER VIEW; Safety first, last and always

David McIntosh
Tuesday 05 March 1996 19:02 EST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

The Law Commission's new recommendations, published yesterday, creating a new criminal offence of "corporate killing" are well-motivated but misguided.

In circumstances where corporations cannot be imprisoned, only fined, what is proposed adds very little to the duties, powers and penalties already in place. These include the Health & Safety Executive's power to shut down a business that poses a serious risk of injury, and related powers to order improved safety practices. This is backed up by the threat of prosecution, hefty fines and even imprisonment of directors or managers for repeated disregarding of formal warnings. Furthermore, the Department of Trade & Industry can seek the disqualification of "unsafe directors" from taking any part in the management of business.

Unfortunately, these existing powers have not sufficiently affected boardroom attitudes. The HSE's own staffing and funding have been woefully inadequate in recent years, despite repeated calls to restore and increase its capabilities. At present, it can do little more than investigate after the loss of life or limb.

The DTI's power of disqualification for safety reasons has rarely been used (only once, to my knowledge, in three and a half years) and yet thousands of directors have been removed for fiscal mismanagement, which has not put any lives at risk. Adding a new criminal offence to an already over- stuffed statute book may do more for lawyers' pockets than for safety. The better way forward is to encourage management to become more safety conscious before the event.

Most disasters are the result of years of sloppy practices and ignored warnings. What is needed is legislation requiring all companies to put their safety record (including details of warnings and prosecutions) on public view. By this means, safety failures could not be swept under the corporate carpet until disaster strikes, and the public could compare safety records, as well as prices, before purchasing. Bad safety, just like bad financial performance, would have to be publicly justified or remedied. Lives would be saved.

This idea was the main thrust of the Corporate Accountability Bill, which I prepared and my firm put forward more than four years ago, to government, opposition, the HSE, the TUC and employer groups. Putting safety records in the public domain was broadly welcomed but not pursued. It is still needed. This reform is outside the Law Commission's remit, but it is well within the power of the Government. Will it act before yet another disaster?

The writer is a senior partner of Davis Arnold Cooper, which has been involved in legal actions resulting from the Piper Alpha oil platform explosion and Hillsborough disaster.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in