A blackmailer's taxation

Tom Hardy
Saturday 30 September 1995 18:02 EDT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

SO THE Nicholas Budgens of the Government are whingeing about how unconstitutional would be the windfall tax on the privatised monopolies referred to in your article "Blair hints at Labour tax cuts" (24 September). They suggest that it is wrong to make a deal and then, once settled, demand further payment.

Does this mean that the loony right is now admitting the immorality of demanding from those of us who are long resident the pounds 60 levy that all Commonwealth emigres were forced to pay in 1988 to retain the right of abode? A nice little earner and, as is the way with blackmail, a piece of extortion which could be exacted again and again, unlike a one-off windfall tax.

Tom Hardy

London SW12

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in