A-Z of Skiing: V is for vertical drop
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Vertical drop is a lot less exciting than it sounds. It's a statistic, not an adrenalin sport. A measure of the potential of a ski area, it represents the difference between the altitude at the top of the area - or, rather, the highest point reached by the lifts - and that at the bottom.
Vertical drop is a lot less exciting than it sounds. It's a statistic, not an adrenalin sport. A measure of the potential of a ski area, it represents the difference between the altitude at the top of the area - or, rather, the highest point reached by the lifts - and that at the bottom.
Like most statistics, the vertical (in skiing parlance, the "drop" is often dropped) is a somewhat crude measure. On its own, it conveys little about the quality of the skiing: long, gentle runs may, ultimately, have the same vertical as stirring, short ones. And it can be misleading, in that ski areas which have a big vertical but a low base may be completely skiable only in perfect snow conditions. Nevertheless, it's a useful measure of quantity for those skiers who like numbers - especially big ones.
According to the Snowhunter database, the biggest vertical drops are at Chamonix (2807m), Verbier (2509m, with the last section off-piste), Zermatt (2375m down to Valtournenche in Italy), Alagna (2345m) and Les Deux Alpes (2298m). But Snowhunter's Patrick Thorne, being of an amusingly perverse disposition, admits to finding his list of the areas with the smallest vertical "much more exciting". He says Yawgoo Valley in Rhode Island, USA, "has a whopping 21-metre vertical" (horizontal would perhaps be a more appropriate word). Even more astonishing, the London Ski Club in Ontario (38m vertical) and Spring Hill Winter Park in Manitoba (36m) "both have four-seater chair-lifts to whisk skiers to the summit".
For those who lack a head for heights, however, there's no need to cross the Atlantic for low-altitude skiing. Years ago, I first ventured out on skis at a dry slope in London's Crystal Palace Park. Checking in an early Snowhunter reference work, I discovered that its vertical drop was 8m.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments