A-Z of Skiing: P is for Piste Map
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.One of Britain's best ski writers once claimed that he could always find his way around a ski area but was capable of getting lost inside his hotel. The latter, possibly; but the former? One would have to be a magician to conjure so unerringly three dimensions of reality from the two-dimensional work of imagination known as a piste "map".
One of Britain's best ski writers once claimed that he could always find his way around a ski area but was capable of getting lost inside his hotel. The latter, possibly; but the former? One would have to be a magician to conjure so unerringly three dimensions of reality from the two-dimensional work of imagination known as a piste "map".
The most common complaint about these maps is that their colour-coding misrepresents the difficulty of the descents. Strictly, this is an unfair criticism: when a ski area's pistes are rated as easy (green), medium (blue), difficult (red) or very difficult (black), that usually does convey their relative difficulty. But one resort's red is another's black. The temptation to take an "average" slope and then rate all the others in relation to it is irresistible, because every resort wants the piste map to suggest that it has runs suitable for skiers of all abilities - even if it doesn't.
Secondly, squeezing a mountain range into two dimensions has a seriously distorting effect: what appears to be a consistent, straight skiing face can, in reality, turn through 90 degrees or more. In ski areas which spread across both sides of several valleys, the effect can be highly misleading. The solution would be to show conceptual models rather than "photographic" images; but resorts seem reluctant to make the necessary investment.
The absence of points of the compass from piste maps is also irritating, because it makes assessing snow and weather conditions difficult. Far better to use a proper, 4cm=1km plan (which will mark the lifts though not the descents); by comparison, navigating with a piste map is like walking around London using an Underground map for guidance.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments