Amsterdam’s Schiphol Airport prevented from reducing flights by Dutch court ruling
Decision is a blow to environmental groups
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.The Dutch government cannot proceed with plans to reduce the number of flights from Amsterdam’s Schiphol Airport after a judge ruled against the order on 5 April.
In a bid to cut carbon emissions and noise pollution, the government proposed last year that flights from one of Europe’s busiest aviation hubs be cut from 500,000 per year to 460,000 per year.
The move was welcomed by environmentalists but condemned by the Netherlands’ aviation industry, resulting in a case being brought by airlines and civil aviation organisations, led by Dutch flag carrier KLM.
A judge in the city of Haarlem ruled that the Dutch government had not followed correct procedure when it called on Schiphol to reduce flight numbers.
The ruling means that Schiphol “may not reduce the maximum number of flights... to 460,000,” the court in Haarlem said in a statement.
The Netherlands’ aviation ministry said it is now studying the ruling and considering next steps.
It is “striving to find a new balance between the interests of residents and the living environment on the one hand and the economic importance of Schiphol for the Netherlands on the other,” the ministry said in a statement.
Meanwhile, KLM claimed it has plans to offer “a better alternative for achieving less noise and CO2 while meeting travellers’ need to fly.”
The airline said it would explain its approach in the next phase of the case. “This will investigate whether noise levels can be reduced around Schiphol using methods other than those envisaged by the ministry,” said KLM.
The ruling comes shortly after Schiphol Airport proposed a ban on private jets and the loudest planes in a bid to limit pollution and noise.
The proposals, announced on Tuesday by the airport’s boss, also include phasing out all flights between midnight and 5am, and abandoning a project for an additional runway in a push to be more considerate of the environment.
“We have thought about growth but too little about its impact for too long. We need to be sustainable for our employees, the local environment and the world,” said Ruud Sondag, CEO of the Schiphol Group.
“The only way forward is to become quieter and cleaner more rapidly,” Mr Sondag added.
It is hoped the measures will create a “cleaner and better” system for the notoriously busy airport, according to a Schiphol airport statement.
Additional reporting by AP
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments