Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Open Jaw: You don't have to tell all to get results

Where readers write back

Friday 29 April 2011 19:00 EDT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Customer Satisfaction Questionnaires Following our return from a recent ski holiday in La Thuile with Neilson, we were so fed up with an excursion arranged by Neilson to a neighbouring resort which had resulted in four hours on a coach and involved the police being called out to divert our double-decker that could not get under a road bridge, that we decided to post our CSQ direct to Neilson with an account of the experience.

Neilson rang us and have now refunded the amount spent on the excursion – a satisfactory result. Incidentally, we gave no information about our mobile phone contract, house insurance or make of underpants but despite this lack of info, the CSQ was read and acted upon – good for Neilson.

Richard Prowse

After completing the tatty paper CSQ in the room at the Holiday Inn Express in Cambridge (which was, incidentally, "Good" but not "Excellent") and not receiving an apology for the 10 minutes it took to check-in, I was offered another opportunity by e-mail.

I replied suggesting they provide me with a free night and then I might be more motivated. They have not replied.

Martin Haworth, Gloucester

We are all encouraged to give complete strangers too much information about ourselves. Every time you are asked for information about yourself think about it and if the information serves no useful purpose to you, do not provide it, and say why you refuse – ie it is intrusive.

"Omemiserum"

More on airport security

Just read your article about Stansted and Luton. Living "Oop North" I am fortunate enough to avoid those understaffed palaces of delight. The Manchester airport authorities have gripped the problem and, when we went out a week last Sunday, there were about 16 security paths to go through and a large number of staff. It still takes time to get through, but it's getting better. One thing that would help is the handing out of a robust bag as passengers approach the point for them to start putting watches, coins, mobiles etc in as they move forward.

Andrew Perry

With a 10.55am easyJet flight from Luton to Montpellier, I was intending to take the 9am train to Luton Parkway from Kentish Town arriving at the airport circa 9.45. Following your article I will now take an much earlier train which also requires a change at St Albans. At least I have a regulation plastic bag which I was required to buy when I last passed through Luton.

Sandra Hunt

Britain by B-road

Please don't clog up our rural roads. Let the fools stay on the motorway if they can't figure it out for themselves.

"Spiralise"

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in