Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Map identifies the best and worst places for emergency healthcare in the world

The Health Risk Map helps ensure travellers are aware of the risks they could be exposed to in different countries

Wednesday 25 February 2015 07:31 EST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Planning your summer holiday? You might want to take a look at the latest stats released by health organisation International SOS, which show which countries have the worst emergency healthcare.

According to the company’s annual International Health Risk Map - which ranks destinations as low risk, medium risk, high risk, and extreme risk - popular holiday destinations such as Mexico, Turkey, Morocco and Thailand have all been labelled medium risk, with their emergency medical facilities described as “average”.

The UK, the US, Greece, Iceland, Japan, and Australia are some of the best countries in which to receive medical treatment, while countries like North Korea, Iraq, Afghanistan, and Syria were deemed to have the worst healthcare.

Countries are considered high risk if they have limited medical facilities combined with higher risks of serious infectious diseases such as cholera, typhoid or dengue fever. Tourists have been warned that if they fall ill in high-risk countries, such as Tanzania, Egypt, Laos, and Cambodia, they may need to be evacuated to a different country to receive higher quality healthcare.

Emergency healthcare has, however, improved in parts of Africa. Countries such as Ethiopia, Kenya, Malawi, and Rwanda have been moved into a lower risk category, a marked improvement on previous years. It’s thought the progress comes as a result of foreign investment in private and state healthcare facilities.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in