Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.A new scientific test has confirmed what most of us know already about flying - the way we board airplanes is far from efficient.
The results of an experiment by particle physicist Jason Steffen released last week confirm his theory, first formulated in 2008, that a specific boarding order of passengers could greatly reduce the amount of time standing on the tarmac and in the aisle while other passengers stow their luggage.
The so-called 'Steffen method' boards passengers in a unique way, beginning with window seats in alternate rows on one side of the plane, followed by window seats in alternate rows on the other side, followed by the same pattern for the window seats in the empty rows.
The same process would be used for the middle seats and the aisle seats, allowing all passengers to have the space they need to stow their luggage and take their seats.
Although the 2008 study was just a hypothesis, the test results released last week using 72 passengers show just how much time the Steffen method saves, boarding passengers in almost half the time of traditional 'block' boarding (completed in 3:36 instead of 6:54).
The study also suggested that random seat allocations, commonly used by low-cost airlines to save time, are indeed far faster than allocated seat boarding, but slower still than the Steffen method, at 4:44.
It remains to be seen whether any airlines will implement the Steffen method, which would require a precise boarding order difficult for airports to manage - although as Dr. Steffen believes it could save millions of dollars, they certainly have an incentive to try it.
Study: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0969699708000239
Experiment: http://arxiv.org/abs/1108.5211
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments