What will the EU’s new entry-exit system mean for British travellers?

Plans to take fingerprints and facial biometrics from British travellers to Europe have been postponed yet again.

In August, the European Union vowed that the long-awaited “entry-exit system” (EES) would go ahead on 10 November 2024. The plan was that every frontier in Schengen Area (comprising all EU nations except Cyprus and Ireland, as well as Iceland, Norway and Switzerland) would stop “wet-stamping” passports and instead record entries and exits on a central database together with biometric information.

But exactly a month before EES was due to be launched, the EU quietly revealed it has been postponed indefinitely by the European Commission.

A tersely worded report about a meeting of the Justice and Home Affairs Council on 10 October revealed : “To ensure a smooth transition, the Commission outlined plans to roll out the EES in a phased manner. The details of this approach will be established in the coming weeks.”

In addition, the system appears to have been watered down, with the Commission saying the plan is now to “scan the fingerprints or take a photo of those crossing the border for the first time”.

The key word in that phrase is or rather than and. Previously the plan was to demand both fingerprints and facial biometrics from every traveller from the same day, in a “big-bang” approach. The report indicates that some kind of pilot programme will be launched first, and demands for biometrics could be deferred still further.

There is now no prospect that the system will be running before the end of 2024. One source told The Independent: “It will almost certainly be well into 2025 before there is any chance of it having a significant effect on British travellers.”

“The most modern digital border management system in the world,” according to the European Commission. “An automated IT system for registering non-EU nationals who are travelling to the EU for a short stay.”

The system is aimed all “third-country nationals” when they either enter or leave at an external Schengen border – such as flying from the UK to Spain or crossing by road from Greece to Turkey. It will not be used at internal frontiers within the Schengen Area.

EES will register the date and place of entry or exit. The original plan was to take fingerprints and a facial biometric, but it now appears to be an “either/or”.

This system, says the European Union, “will replace the current system of manual stamping of passports, which is time-consuming, does not provide reliable data on border crossings, and does not allow a systematic detection of over-stayers”.

British travellers, like other third-country nationals, are restricted to 90 days’ stay in any 180 days within the Schengen area. But enforcement of this currently depends on checking passport stamps and is applied haphazardly.

The new system will not apply in Ireland or Cyprus. For clarity, Irish and Cypriot citizens will no change when entering the Schengen Area; as now, they will simply be matched with their passport or ID card.

So any British traveller with the fortune to have an Irish (or other EU) passport can use it and skip the queues.

Because we demanded to become subject to the EES, which was initially being developed while the UK was a member of the EU.

After the UK voted to leave the European Union, Boris Johnson’s government negotiated for British travellers to become third-country nationals subject to a range of restrictions. British passport holders must currently have their travel documents inspected and stamped.

The good news: passport stamping will end. The bad news: the process of fingerprinting and/or providing a facial biometric will be slower and more onerous.

Originally the entry-exit system was due to start in 2021. But the body responsible for implementation – the European Union Agency for the Operational Management of Large-Scale IT Systems in the Area of Freedom, Security and Justice (EU-Lisa) – has repeatedly pushed back the date because the database was far from ready.

In October 2023, the European Council’s Justice and Home Affairs Council endorsed a new timeline for the roll-out of EES.

The council said in a statement: “The new roadmap for the delivery of the new IT architecture foresees that the entry-exit system will be ready to enter into operation in autumn 2024.”

In August 2024, the EU’s Home Affairs commissioner, Ylva Johansson, said: “I have decided that the Entry/Exit System will enter into operations on 10 November. That will be a great day – entry-exit system day.”

Many airports, ports and railway stations have already installed expensive equipment. But a month before the big day, ministers decided to postpone the introduction indefinitely.

France, Germany and the Netherlands are known to have serious concerns about whether the system will work as intended. The chief executive of easyJet, Johan Lundgren, said passengers could be held on planes at airports if queues in arrivals halls build up.

Officials in Brussels are now looking at dates in 2025 – but any implementation in the months from Easter to September will coincide with high levels of border crossings. Unless some pilot system can begin in the first three months of the new year, the whole project will be postponed until autumn 2025.

Inbound and outbound passengers will go through the formalities at airports, land borders and ports in the Schengen Area on arrival and departure.

Three locations in the UK have “juxtaposed” border controls, with French frontier police conducting checks on British soil: at the Port of Dover, Eurotunnel’s Folkestone terminal and the Eurostar hub at London St Pancras.

On the first registration, travellers must submit to fingerprint checks and/or provide a facial biometric. On subsequent visits within three years, only a facial biometric will be taken.

Each new visit triggers another three years of validity, until the passport ceases to be valid for travel to the EU (either on its 10th birthday or when less than three months remains before the expiry date.

When using a new passport, a fresh biometric registration is required.

Some EU members have expressed alarm at the extra time involved in the new processes, with the Slovenian government warning: “It takes up to four times longer to do the new process.”

For terrestrial travellers it could be even worse. Giving evidence to Parliament about the new system, Tim Reardon, head of EU exit for the Port of Dover, said: “There is no such thing as an e-gate for a car, and there is no such thing as an e-gate process for people travelling as a group. They’re all one-at-a-time processes.

“There is no way of doing a biometric control without getting everyone out of the vehicle.

“That’s the one thing on our site which cannot happen, because you’re in the middle of live traffic. It would be equivalent to asking people to get out of their car at a motorway toll booth. It’s fundamentally unsafe and it can’t happen.”

In January 2024, MPs were warned that Brits travelling to Europe could face waits of 14 hours or more at border control unless measures are introduced to prevent delays. Parliament’s European Scrutiny Committee was told by Ashford Borough Council that 14-hour queues were a “reasonable worst case” scenario if the scheme were to be implemented as planned in October.

One or more medium-sized airports could run biometric checks and take passengers’ passport data, in order to assess how smoothly the operation runs. But it could only be a “shadow” EES, with passport stamping continuing.

Transport operators from ferry firms to airlines have lobbied Brussels on the entry-exit system, proposing that biometric data could be collected gradually during a 12-to-18-month transition period.

It appears from the latest announcement that passport registration will go ahead for all travellers, but biometric registration could initially be reduced to just one in 10 travellers if queues build up.

Local immigration officials will decide the appropriate number of travellers required to register their biometrics, on a range from 10 to 100 per cent as a “relief valve” as the process is first introduced.

They will breeze through the frontier via special lanes where the only check will be a glance at their passport to check (a) it’s valid and (b) it’s their’s. So, as it used to be for British passport holders before Brexit.

The Electronic Travel Information and Authorisation System (Etias) is the next step in tightening frontier controls. It is an online permit for third-country nationals who do not require visas. It is similar to the US Esta scheme, but cheaper at €7 (£6) and valid for longer: three years. While those under 18 or over 70 will still need to apply for and hold an Etias, it will be free.

In order to work, Etias requires EES to be fully operational. Once the entry-exit system has been running for six months, Etias is due to be introduced. But initially a six-month grace period will be granted – so it will not be mandatory for prospective UK visitors to apply online for permission to enter the Schengen Area for at least a year after the complete introduction of EES.

Officially, no. Europe says that Etias is “a pre-travel authorisation system”. It is a similar concept to the US Esta, the Canadian eTA and the British ETA, which are not technically visas. They are issued to international travellers who do not require a full visa.

But as Etias requires visitors to apply in advance, provide lots of personal information, pay money and be issued with a permit to cross a border, it is not surprising that it is commonly termed a “eurovisa”.

When finally the EU is ready, at the heart of the system is an Etias app and website. Travellers will be required to submit personal information including name, address, contact details in Europe and passport data. They must also state an occupation (with job title and employer). Students must give the name of their educational establishment.

The applicant must give details of any serious convictions in the past 20 years.

Travellers must also provide online the reason for their journey (holiday, business, visiting family, etc), specify the country they will first arrive in, and provide the address of their first night’s stay – which will pose a problem for tourists who like to make plans as they go along.

Every application will be checked against EU and relevant Interpol databases, as well as “a dedicated Etias watch-list”.

The system will be tuned to pick out individuals suspected of being involved in terrorism, armed robbery, child pornography, fraud, money laundering, cybercrime, people smuggling, trafficking in endangered animal species, counterfeiting and industrial espionage.

Yes, As with other online travel permits, commercial intermediaries are allowed – but according to Frontex, the EU organisation implementing Etias, there are many scam sites out there that are likely to apply fees way above the basic €7 (£6).

Any site other than europa.eu/etias is unofficial and should not be trusted.

One “imposter” site claims to have processed 671 applications already; this is impossible since no applications have been processed anywhere.

Another site offers a 40 per cent discount for early applications. Some use the EU logo, which is illegal.

Frontex also warns about the risk of identity theft if personal information is provided to imposter sites.

The European Union says: “We strongly advise you to obtain the Etias travel authorisation before you buy your tickets and book your hotels.”

The aim is for an Etias to be granted within minutes, though even a straightforward application could take up to four days.

If an application is flagged (ie there is a “hit” with one of the databases) the applicant may be asked to provide additional information. Alternatively, says the EU, the applicant may be asked “to participate in an interview with national authorities, which may take up to additional 30 days”.

Assuming yours is granted, there is no certificate issued, and nothing needs to be printed. The frontier guard will get the information he or she needs from the passport you used to apply.

Yes. Details of how to appeal will be included with the notice of rejection.

No. “Mere possession of a travel authorisation does not confer an automatic right of entry,” says the EU. As with the US, travellers can be turned away for any reason.

There is likely to be a mechanism in place for an Etias to be rescinded.

No. The permit will be valid for three years, or until your passport runs out, whichever is the earlier.

No. The Common Travel Area incorporating the UK, Ireland, the Isle of Man and the Channel Islands transcends European Union rules, and in any event, Ireland is not in the Schengen area.

No.

They will be expected to get a friend, a family member or a travel agent to make the application for them, in the same way as the US Esta and similar schemes.

This rule, to which the UK asked to be subject after leaving the European Union, means that British travellers cannot stay more than 90 days in any stretch of 180 days.

As an example of what it means: if you were to spend the first 90 days of 2024 (January, February and almost all of March) in the Schengen area, you would not be able to return until late June.

No. Work on strengthening the European Union’s external border began a decade ago. British officials participated in initial planning for the entry-exit system and online registration for third-country nationals.

After the nation voted to leave the European Union, Boris Johnson’s government negotiated for British travellers to be classified as third-country nationals. In other words, the UK asked to be subject to all the extra red tape that everyone already knew was on the horizon. The EU agreed. So Brussels is delivering exactly what we asked for.

No. Were the UK still in the EU, neither EES nor Etias would affect British passport holders.

Citizens of EU countries outside the Schengen Area (currently Cyprus and Ireland) need not go through the entry-exit rigmarole nor get an Etias. They simply have their passport/ID checked on arrival and departure, usually via a fast-track line.

That’s what the UK chose to give up.