Easter Island is limiting the number of days tourists can stay
It's the latest tourist hotspot to try to minimise the adverse effects of mass tourism
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Easter Island, home to the mysterious Moai statues, is reducing the number of days tourists can stay on the island from 90 to 30 days.
The decision has been made in an attempt to reduce the negative impact of tourism on the tiny island.
Social and environmental concerns have been cited as reasons behind the rule change.
At the last census in 2017, there were reportedly 7,750 people living on Easter Island, a figure almost double the population of 20 years previously, before the island was hit by a sharp increase in tourism and subsequent development.
According to the island’s mayor, Petro Edmunds, that number is 3,000 “too many”.
“Foreigners are already taking over the island. They’re damaging the local idiosyncrasy, the 1,000-year culture is changing and not for the good,” Edmunds told AFP.
Edmunds was also reported to say that “customs from the continent” had begun to permeate the island and that this was “not positive”.
The environmental impact of the increase in visitors is also being felt.
A decade ago, the island produced 1.4 metric tons of waste per year, but that figure has almost doubled to 2.5 tons today, according to Digital Journal.
Ana Maria Gutierrez, the local government’s environmental advisor, told APF that “environmentally, the island is very fragile.”
The ruling, which is due to be implemented from Wednesday 1 August, includes Chileans who are not part of the island’s indigenous population, the Rapa Nui people.
On arrival, tourists will be required to present their hotel reservation or an invitation from a resident.
A limit to the number of visitors allowed on the island will also be introduced, although this figure is yet to be confirmed.
Edmunds said he would prefer a “total” ban on the arrival of new residents, but conceded that the legislation was “a good start”.
The enigmatic island, located 2,185 miles from the Chilean mainland, has been ruled by Chile since 1888 and was run as a sheep farm by a Scottish company until 1953.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments