Quarantine: British Airways may challenge government’s plans in court
The 14-day mandatory self-isolation law applies initially for one year but will be reviewed every three weeks
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.British Airways’ parent company is contemplating a legal challenge to the UK’s first blanket quarantine scheme.
From 8 June, almost all arrivals at UK airports, ferry ports and international rail terminals will be required to self-isolate at home for two weeks. Quarantinees who fail to comply face fixed penalties of £1,000.
Just 62 hours before the measure comes into force, Willie Walsh, chief executive of IAG, said: “We are giving consideration to a legal challenge to this legislation.”
Speaking to Ian King on Sky News, he said: “I wrote to MPs last night to say this initiative has in effect torpedoed our opportunity to get flying in July.
“We think it’s irrational, we think it’s disproportionate.”
The legislation applies initially for one year, though quarantine will be reviewed every three weeks.
Mr Walsh said IAG and British Airways would be reviewing a possible legal challenge with lawyers later on Friday.
“I suspect there are other airlines who are doing so,” he said.
The most likely grounds for mounting a challenge are thought to be the scientific evidence on which the policy is based, and the failure properly to consult with airlines.
When the home secretary announced the measures in the Commons, she repeatedly refused to say whether the government’s Scientific Advisory Group on Emergencies (Sage) had recommended imposing the quarantine – given the high level of transmission within the UK.
Priti Patel told MPs: “We know they will present difficulties for the tourism industry, but that’s why we have an unprecedented package of support, the most comprehensive in the world, for both employees and businesses.
“But we will all suffer in the long run if we get this wrong. That’s why it’s crucial that we introduce these measures now.”
Mr Walsh said: “It’s important to point out there was no consultation with the industry prior to enacting this legislation.”
British Airways and IAG declined to take part in a government briefing on Thursday about the new arrangements.
BA is offering travellers booked to fly to the UK from Monday onwards the chance to switch to earlier flights without penalty.
The Independent has asked the Home Office for a response.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments