Hitchhiking and carsharing banned over coronavirus fears
Exclusive: AA warns that prohibiting carsharing could put more commuters at risk
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.For the first time ever, hitchhiking and carsharing have been banned in the UK.
Under the latest government regulations for dealing with the coronavirus outbreak, travellers are warned: “You can only travel in a private vehicle alone, or with members of your household.”
The effect is to prohibit hitchhiking anywhere in Britain. Previously, thumbing a ride was illegal only on motorways.
A Twitter poll conducted for The Independent found that four out of five self-selecting respondents said it would be irresponsible to hitchhike in the present circumstances.
Among drivers, 82 per cent agreed, while for non-drivers the figure fell to 71 per cent.
But the leading motoring organisation has expressed concern that banning carsharing could increase risk, if it meant more people use public transport.
The president of the AA, Edmund King, said: “Being unable to car share with anyone outside your family could be problematic particularly for car sharing commuters.
“Many workers who are unable to drive or don’t own cars, don’t want to use public transport and can’t walk or cycle due to the distance of their commutes, have now had another practical option of travel removed.
“Surely it would be safer travelling with one other person in the rear seat diagonally behind the driver, possibly with face coverings, rather than using over-crowded public transport?”
The AA is to raise the issue with the government.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments