Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.US legislators have joined consumer rights groups in criticizing new charges levied by low-cost airlines, raising the possibility of a confrontation with budget carriers as public opinion turns.
Spirit Airlines' decision to charge passengers up to $45 for hand luggage taken onto a flight, which some fear could spread to other airlines, drew condemnation from US Transportation Secretary Ray LaHood, who branded the charge "outrageous".
"We're gonna hold the airline's feet to the fire on this," said LaHood in an interview with travel site Elliott.org. "I think it's a bit outrageous that an airline is going to charge someone to carry on a bag and put it in the overhead. And I've told our people to try and figure out a way to mitigate that."
New York Democrat Senator Charles Schumer has also said that he will attempt to introduce legislation to block the move by Spirit. In an email on April 11, Schumer called the move a "slap in the face to travelers."
Discontent is growing on both sides of the Atlantic. On April 6, British consumer group Which? accused budget airline Ryanair of cashing in on summer travelers by raising its checked bag fees by one third during the peak July and August travel period, warning that flying with Ryanair "is not always as cheap as it first appears."
"Ryanair might claim that they are incentivising people to travel light, but we think it is more a case of penalising those families who can only go away on holiday during this time, said Rochelle Turner, Head of Research for Which? Holiday.
In a recent interview in Stockholm, Ryanair Chief Executive Michael O'Leary branded a Swedish consumer rights group a "bunch of idiots" for ordering Ryanair to compensate a family who were reportedly left stranded when the aircraft they were booked to depart on landed in a different airport, nearly 40 km away.
PR-savvy O'Leary then fuelled the fire by saying that Ryanair had not ruled out charging passengers to use the bathroom on flights. FlyersRights.org, an airline consumer organization, called for the US Congress to ban both Spirit's carry-on charges and toilet fees, such as those proposed by Ryanair, immediately.
"The commercial airlines have reached a new low by attempting to charge passengers for the right to place their luggage in the overhead bins," said Flyers Rights President and Founder, Kate Hanni. "It seems they will continue try and squeeze out every dollar they can from passengers, regardless of economic hardship, inconvenience or humiliation."
Low-cost airlines make a large percentage of their profits through "ancillary charges," which allows them to reduce the price of a basic ticket. However, the mood of the public now appears to be shifting against such charges - less than 10 percent of respondents to a recent poll on TripAdvisor said that they would be willing to pay for carry-on luggage.
http://www.elliott.org/
http://www.which.co.uk/
http://www.flyersrights.org/
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments