Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Airlines allowed to get away with ‘unlawful’ behaviour for 20 years, Which? claims

The consumer group believes the Civil Aviation Authority ‘should be doing more’ to pursue court action against law-breaking carriers

Travel Desk
Friday 30 June 2023 07:22 EDT
Comments
The CAA was given the ability to apply to courts for enforcement orders against airlines in June 2003
The CAA was given the ability to apply to courts for enforcement orders against airlines in June 2003 (Alamy/PA)

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Air travellers are being failed as no airlines have been fined due to regulatory action in 20 years despite numerous cases of “unlawful” behaviour, according to a consumer group.

Which? claimed the Civil Aviation Authority (CAA) “should be doing more” to pursue court action against law-breaking carriers, and “urgently needs stronger enforcement powers”.

The CAA was given the ability to apply to courts for enforcement orders against airlines in June 2003 but has used this power just once against a major carrier, in 2018, Which? said.

In that case, Ryanair escaped punishment following a three-year court battle after it agreed to pay passengers compensation for flights cancelled during a strike by pilots.

Which? noted that British Airways was fined $1.1 million (£900,000) by the Department of Transportation (DOT) in the US earlier this month over delays in issuing refunds for flights to and from the country which were cancelled during the coronavirus pandemic.

The DOT said it took action after receiving more than 1,200 complaints.

The lack of similar action in the UK – where many more passengers suffered delays to pay outs from the airline – is “an embarrassing indictment of weak passenger protections”, Which? said.

The consumer organisation’s analysis found more than 24,000 complaints about airlines relating to compensation were made to the CAA and the UK’s two alternative dispute resolution bodies in 2020.

In the UK, airlines are required to issue refunds for cancelled flights within seven days, but many consumers were forced to wait several months at the height of the virus crisis. Other nations whose regulators have fined airlines in recent years include Italy, Germany and Greece.

The Department for Transport (DfT) announced this week that it plans to give the CAA the power to fine airlines for breaches of consumer laws.

Which? called for this legislation to be included in the King’s Speech later this year.

That would demonstrate the Government’s intention to implement the change during the next parliamentary session.

Which? director of policy and advocacy, Rocio Concha, said: “The US government fining Britain’s flag carrier when our own authorities are powerless to do the same makes a mockery of aviation regulation in the UK, which has been failing travellers for 20 years.

Passengers have repeatedly endured unfair and, in some cases, unlawful treatment by some airlines in recent years and meaningful action is long past due.

“The Government must act without delay and legislate to grant the CAA the powers it needs to issue hefty fines, and hold airlines to account when they break the law.

“Until it does so, UK travellers’ rights will be worth no more than the paper they are written on.”

CAA head of consumer Anna Bowles said: “We have regularly asked for stronger consumer enforcement powers, including the ability to impose fines on airlines.

“This would allow us to take faster action when appropriate and bring our powers in line with other sectoral regulators.”

A British Airways spokesman said: “Where a customer’s flight is cancelled, we always offer options including a full refund, rerouting or rebooking onto another service, including with other airlines. We always meet our legal obligations.”

Ryanair said in a statement: “Any Ryanair customers who are entitled to compensation due to staff strikes in 2018 – and who applied directly to Ryanair for compensation – have received compensation directly from Ryanair in line with EU261.”

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in