Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Air traffic controller keeps licence despite ‘having sex with married woman while on duty’

Judge revokes decision because ‘it is not sufficiently proven’ that man was handcuffed at the time

Helen Coffey
Tuesday 29 March 2022 12:33 EDT
Comments
Alleged incident took place in an air traffic control tower
Alleged incident took place in an air traffic control tower (Getty Images/iStockphoto)

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

An air traffic controller (ATC) has kept his licence despite allegations that he had sex with a married woman while handcuffed to a chair in the control tower.

The unnamed New Zealand man previously had his licence revoked in 2019 following an investigation.

However, that decision was repealed after a three-day hearing in the Wellington District Court in December 2021.

Judge Chris Tuohy has now ruled that, although he believed the woman’s claim that the pair had sex while the ATC was on duty was inherently plausible, he didn’t think her allegation that he was handcuffed at the time was “sufficiently proven”.

“The appellant voluntarily engaged in distracting behaviour which must have impinged on his capacity to react but, in my judgment, it is not sufficiently proven that he engaged in the even more risky and irresponsible behaviour of allowing himself to be physically prevented from doing so,” said Judge Tuohy, reports Open Justice.

The ATC admitted to starting an affair with the woman in early 2017 – while both were still married to other people – after meeting on a dating app.

But, while he said he had been alone with the woman on three separate occasions in the control tower, he denied her claim that they had engaged in sexual activities there, only admitting to having had sex in hotels and motels.

After the relationship ended, the woman messaged the ATC’s wife claiming that she had performed a sex act on him while he was handcuffed to a chair in the control tower.

“He acknowledged that [a sex act] while he was in handcuffs had occurred during the sexual relationship but in a hotel room, not in the control tower,” according to an interview undertaken in February 2019 during the original investigation.

The man also alleged that the woman had tried to blackmail him, saying she would ruin his life if he didn’t pay her NZ$50,000 (£26,427).

The CAA director recorded at the time that “on the balance of probabilities” he believed the woman's account.

“He categorised this behaviour as highly irresponsible, intolerable and demonstrating extremely poor judgment,” according to the investigation.

However, after the most recent hearing, Judge Tuohy reversed the decision strip the ATC of his licence, taking into account the short duration of the man’s behaviour within a long, blemish-free career and concluding that, being out of character, such an incident was unlikely to happen again.

The judge ruled it had not been established that the man was not a fit and proper person to exercise the privileges of his ATC licence.

He said: “I have reached that conclusion despite my finding that he did undertake risky behaviour while on duty, although not quite as risky as that which the director relied upon.”

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in