Zuckerberg's role at Facebook challenged by leading investor
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Mark Zuckerberg's tight control over Facebook is under assault from shareholders even before his social networking giant joins the public market.
One of the largest pension funds in the US has promised to take on the company over weak corporate governance structures and the highly unusual decision-making power handed to its 27-year-old founder.
The California State Teachers' Retirement System, Calstrs, says it will raise its concerns in a letter to Facebook and try to get it to change its policies before a stock-market flotation planned for this spring.
Facebook said last week that it would sell around $5bn (£3bn) shares to the public, an offering that could value the company at $75bn-$100bn.
In a prospectus for the share offering, Mr Zuckerberg's dominance over Facebook's decision making became clear for the first time. He owns about 28 per cent of Facebook and some of his early backers, including DST Global and Accel Partners, have given him irrevocable voting rights over their stakes, too. In addition, the shares being sold to the public will have only one-tenth of the voting power of founders' shares.
Mr Zuckerberg has the sole right to appoint his successor, and if founders' shares dwindle over time as a proportion of the company, further restrictions will kick in limiting the power of other shareholders to nominate board members.
Calstrs, which manages $145bn, said "there should be some more respect for capital".
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments