YouTube stars that supported Donald Trump claim site is taking away their money and they'll quit

'Let’s great it straight I’m not flouncing, I’m not taking my ball and going home, I’m not going to start crying on camera'

Andrew Griffin
Friday 11 August 2017 04:34 EDT
Comments
A picture illustration shows YouTube on a cell phone, in front of a YouTube copyright message regarding a video on an LCD screen, in central Bosnian town of Zenica, early June 18, 2014
A picture illustration shows YouTube on a cell phone, in front of a YouTube copyright message regarding a video on an LCD screen, in central Bosnian town of Zenica, early June 18, 2014 (Reuters)

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Prominent right wing YouTube users say the site is censoring them.

Trump-supporting accounts like Paul Joseph Watson and Diamond and Silk say the site is stopping them making money from their videos and hiding them from viewers. And some have said that the censorship is so bad they will be leaving YouTube entirely.

The complaints come in the middle of a controversy surrounding the Google memo, which circulated around the YouTube owner and claimed that its diversity agenda was wrong. Many prominent right-wing personalities have taken up the cause of James Damore, who wrote the memo and was subsequently fired.

Now Trump supporters claim YouTube is “trying to determine what people can and cannot see and hear by removing debate, diversity and a difference of opinion”. That’s according to Diamond and Silk, the YouTube stars that have given support to – and been prominently supported by – the Trump campaign.

While their videos are still online, they said they had been made “no longer eligible for monetisation”. That means that ads won’t be shown before them – and that as a result the pair will receive no money from Google for making them.

Paul Joseph Watson, a right-wing YouTube personality who works on Alex Jones’s Infowars, said that he was also having monetisation removed from his videos. He claimed that every video he made about Islam had been stopped from making money, as well as others including a criticism of modern art.

He also claimed that he was being removed from YouTube’s recommended lists, as part of YouTube’s attempts to stop hate speech. That meant that fewer and fewer people were watching him and his peer’s videos, he said.

Mr Watson laid out his objections in a video titled “I’m done with YouTube… for now”. He begins the video by saying: “think that headline sounds like clickbait? Well think again”.

He said that he might eventually come back to YouTube, particularly if his complaints were addressed. But for now he would mostly be creating videos off the site, he said.

“Let’s great it straight I’m not flouncing, I’m not taking my ball and going home, I’m not going to start crying on camera. I’ll probably come back at some point, if I’m not banned.”

The YouTube user, who also goes by the handle “PrisonPlanet”, suggested that he had predicted his videos would be hidden more than a week before he left, in a video titled “YouTube to Censor ‘Controversial’ Videos”.

Mr Watson’s complaints about YouTube’s algorithms recall those of PewDiePie, who said in November that he would kill his channel because YouTube was trying to reduce the number of people who saw his videos. The deletion turned out to be a prank, but the complaints seemed real.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in