Vine adds 15 content channels in an attempt to hit back at Instagram
Changes are in response to Instagram adding video functionality
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Vine have aimed to boost its popularity with the addition of 15 new content channels and the ability to share other people’s post through ‘Revining’.
The changes are in reaction to the launch of video functionality for Instagram, a move that was calculated to cut into Vine’s user base. On the day after video was added to Instagram the number of links to Vine content fell by nearly half a million, whilst Instagram links shared rose by more than 300,000.
The battle between Vine and Instagram for video-sharing popularity is a proxy war of sorts, being conducted by the apps’ parent companies – Twitter and Facebook respectively.
Vine’s new features have been designed to make content discovery easier. The 15 new channels are spread between the likes of ‘Comedy’, ‘Arts & Entertainment’ and –what we can only assume will be the most clicked on – ‘Cats’ and ‘Dogs’ (separately).
New camera tools have also been added to make shooting videos easier, and users now have the options of making their posts protecting – giving individuals more control over who sees their content. ‘Revining’ allows users to share content with a single tap.
The ‘battle’ between the two services has been seen as overplayed in many sector, with many industry commentators citing the video length (Vine goes for 6 seconds, Instagram goes up to 15), as attracting different styles of content and users.
Despite this though, a majority control over social-media video-sharing is a lucrative property. Advertisers always pay over the odds for video slots as opposed to static images, and both Vine and Instagram have to play to brands in order to monetize their services.
The creation of channels for Vine seem geared towards this sort of ‘native advertising’ – allowing companies to insert sponsored content alongside user-generated videos for a more ‘frictionless’ experience.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments