Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.The European Commission is taking the UK to court for breaking EU rules on safeguarding internet privacy.
The move follows complaints to the Commission from British internet users that they have been targeted by advertisers based on an analysis of their "internet traffic".
A Commission statement today said it first launched legal proceedings in April last year amid concerns about how the UK authorities dealt with citizens' concerns over the use of "behavioural advertising" by internet service providers.
The complaints were handled by the UK Information Commissioner's Office, the UK personal data protection authority and police forces responsible for investigating cases of illegal interception of communications.
Last October, the Commission asked the UK to bring its laws in line with EU privacy and personal data protection requirements.
Today's decision to go to court reflects the Commission's view that the rules are still being breached.
A statement said: "The Commission considers that UK law does not comply with EU rules on consent to interception and on enforcement by supervisory authorities."
It says there is no independent UK national authority to supervise the interception of some communications, even though such an authority is required under the EU's "ePrivacy" and "Data Protection" Directives.
Current UK law also authorises interception of communications "not only where the persons concerned have consented to interception but also when the person intercepting the communications has 'reasonable grounds for believing' that consent to do so has been given."
These UK provisions do not comply with the EU rules, which define consent as a "freely given, specific and informed indication of a person's wishes".
Thirdly, said the Commission, current UK law prohibiting and providing sanctions in case of unlawful interception are limited to "intentional" interception only, whereas EU law requires EU countries to impose penalties for any unlawful interception regardless of whether committed intentionally or not.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments