Two men convicted for possessing extreme ‘WhatsApp porn’ that wasn't viewed
Gary Ticehurst and Mark Kelly sent images for their ‘shock value’ through messaging service
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Two men have been convicted for having “truly disgusting” pornographic images on their mobile phones, sent to them through the WhatsApp messaging service, though one claimed he didn’t watch what he was sent.
Gary Ticehurst and Mark Kelly received pornographic images and footage that were sent to them for “shock value,” the Old Bailey heard, and both pleaded guilty to possessing what the judge called “truly disgusting images”.
The men claimed they had been sent the pornography from an unknown source, the Mirror reported, and that they had been unable to watch it as it “sickened” them.
Mr Kelly, 25, of Stapleford Abbots in Romford, Essex, pleaded guilty to one count of possessing an extreme pornographic image likely to cause injury, and three counts of possessing pornographic images involving animals.
Mr Ticehurst, 28, of Newlands Road on Canvey Island, pleaded guilty to one count of possessing an extreme pornographic image likely to cause injury, and two counts of possessing pornographic images involving animals.
Both men were stopped by police on unrelated matters and were found to have the images on their phones at the time.
Both men defended themselves in court and claimed they were unaware that possessing the images was illegal.
Mr Kelly said he had deleted the videos from his WhatsApp, but had “no idea” that the images would save to his camera roll.
"I didn't even watch the full content of the video. It was very sick and disturbing," he told the court.
Mr Ticehurst, said the photos were on his phone for two months, and that he had “completely forgot about them”.
"I thought they were disgusting and decided not to look at them," he said.
Both men were given a two-year conditional discharge and ordered to pay £500 costs.
Judge Worsley told the court that his sentence was “lenient”, but added that neither men had solicited the content themselves, nor had they attempted to share it with others.
He said: "You have pleaded guilty to possessing truly disgusting images.
"It makes a big difference if someone goes out of their way to seek it, or if they're sent it by some mischievous colleague.
"In your case it was unsolicited. This is an exceptional case in some ways. The public should not find this carte blanche to possess material of this nature."