Twitter now makes it hard to tell who paid for subscription with new definition of verified
Changes widely criticised as they can lead to more opportunities for imposter accounts to be created
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Twitter has removed information differentiating between legacy verified accounts and Twitter Blue subscribers in a move that has caused confusion among users.
Twitter updated the verification description for users on Sunday, making it impossible to distinguish between those who had paid for blue checkmarks and those whose accounts had legacy badges.
When users click on the blue tick of a Twitter account, the prompt now reads: “This account is verified because it’s subscribed to Twitter Blue or is a legacy verified account.”
Previously, those who paid for Twitter Blue had a description that said the account is “verified because it’s subscribed to Twitter Blue.”
Accounts verified under Twitter’s previous system had said: “This is a legacy verified account. It may or may not be notable.”
Twitter chief Elon Musk had previously said the company was going to remove blue ticks from the accounts of legacy verified users from 1 April, meaning only accounts that paid the company $8 or $11 per month would have the badge.
The anticipated changes have been widely criticised as they can lead to more opportunities for imposter accounts to be created, with more likelihood of disinformation spreading on the platform.
“On April 1st, we will begin winding down our legacy verified program and removing legacy verified checkmarks,” Twitter had previously said.
However, only the account belonging to The New York Times lost its gold verification badge sometime between Saturday night and early Sunday morning.
In a since-deleted tweet, the Tesla titan said there would be a “grace” period of a few weeks before the verification checks for accounts not paying for the badge are removed “unless they tell they won’t pay now”.
Following the new change, that doesn’t make it clear to which category an account belongs, several users have said on the platform that they would not pay for Twitter Blue.
LA Laker LeBron James, actor Wesley Snipes, news organisations such as The Washington Post and Los Angeles Times as well as the White House, had said they would not pay Twitter for a verification badge.
CNN reporter Oliver Darcy reported last week that NYT would not be paying for its Twitter verification.
“We aren’t planning to pay the monthly fee for verification of our institutional Twitter accounts,” he said, quoting an NYT spokesperson.
“We also will not reimburse reporters for the verification of personal accounts, except in rare instances where verified status would be essential for reporting purposes,” the spokesperson said.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments