Tweeter is victim of legal steamroller, court told
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.A man fined for a "menacing" tweet is the victim of a legal "steamroller", it was argued at the High Court.
Paul Chambers, 27, did not think anyone would take seriously his threat to blow an airport "sky high".
The accountant sent the tweet in a moment of frustration after Robin Hood Airport, South Yorkshire, was closed by snow in January 2010. But Doncaster magistrates fined him £385, with £600 costs, for sending "a message of a menacing character". Yesterday he asked the High Court to overturn Doncaster Crown Court's decision from last November upholding his conviction and sentence – which pushed the costs against him up to £2,600.
His lawyer, Ben Emmerson QC, said the questions were "whether this prosecution-conviction-sentence was a steamroller to crack a very small nut and whether it was a disproportionate response".
The judges reserved judgement for a future date.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments