Self-driving cars attacked by angry San Francisco residents
Human attacks have accounted for a third of accidents this year
Your support helps us to tell the story
As your White House correspondent, I ask the tough questions and seek the answers that matter.
Your support enables me to be in the room, pressing for transparency and accountability. Without your contributions, we wouldn't have the resources to challenge those in power.
Your donation makes it possible for us to keep doing this important work, keeping you informed every step of the way to the November election
Andrew Feinberg
White House Correspondent
Technology and automotive companies touting self-driving cars as the future of transportation may have some work to convince San Franciscans, who keep attacking the vehicles.
A third of traffic collisions involving autonomous vehicles in 2018 so far featured humans physically confronting the cars, according to data released by California.
In one case, a taxi driver exited his cab and slapped the front passenger window of a General Motors Cruise parked behind him. No one was hurt, though the car sustained a scratch.
In another case, a pedestrian hurtled across an intersection despite a “do not walk” sign, shouting as he went, and rammed his body into a different Cruise’s rear bumper.
If they were hoping to register their disapproval of autonomous cars, they were working against both the burgeoning autonomous car industry and the state of California, which last week said it would allow driverless cars to operate without onboard backup drivers.
The change marked a significant development for self-driving car companies that have already logged millions of miles on public roads as they seek to hone the technology.
Sitting near the epicentre of the tech industry, San Francisco has already had to thresh out the proper way to incorporate self-operating technology into public life.
Late last year the city’s Board of Supervisors passed an ordinance limiting delivery robots from cruising public sidewalks. Supervisor Norman Yee, who initially sought to boot the bots from public sidewalks altogether, warned about a future where “20,000 robots roaming around” had displaced pedestrians into the street.
Soon after that vote, the San Francisco Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals announced it would stop using a security robot after accusations that the machine was harassing homeless people led to threats against the animal welfare nonprofit.
Subscribe to Independent Premium to bookmark this article
Want to bookmark your favourite articles and stories to read or reference later? Start your Independent Premium subscription today.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments