Samsung accused of ‘fake’ Moon photos

Galaxy S20 Ultra uses AI trickery to ‘just slap that texture when a moon-like thing is detected’, viral post claims

Anthony Cuthbertson
Monday 13 March 2023 15:08 EDT
Comments
Samsung’s flagship smartphone boasts a Space Zoom feature that users have accused of ‘faking’ photos of the Moon
Samsung’s flagship smartphone boasts a Space Zoom feature that users have accused of ‘faking’ photos of the Moon (Getty Images/ iStock)

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Users of Samsung’s flagship smartphone have accused the company of faking shots of the Moon with its AI-powered Space Zoom feature.

In a widely-shared post on social media, Reddit user u/ibreakphotos tested the capabilities of the Galaxy S20 Ultra in an effort to prove that the 100x zoom level uses trickery in order to produce highly-detailed images of the Moon.

The test involved taking a photo of an intentionally low-resolution image of the Moon, which was displayed on a computer screen. The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra then added details to the blurry image of the Moon that were not in the original image.

“The moon pictures from Samsung are fake. Samsung’s marketing is deceptive,” the user wrote in the lengthy Reddit post.

“It is adding detail where there is none (in this experiment, it was intentionally removed).... The reality is, it’s AI doing most of the work, not the optics, the optics aren’t capable of resolving the detail that you see. Since the Moon is tidally locked to the Earth, it’s very easy to train your model on other moon images and just slap that texture when a moon-like thing is detected.”

Reddit user u/ibreakphotos claimed Samsung’s phones are ‘leveraging an AI model to put craters and other details on places which were just a blurry mess’
Reddit user u/ibreakphotos claimed Samsung’s phones are ‘leveraging an AI model to put craters and other details on places which were just a blurry mess’ (Reddit/ ibreakphotos)

The user added: “There’s a difference between additional processing a la super-resolution, when multiple frames are combined to recover detail which would otherwise be lost, and this, where you have a specific AI model trained on a set of moon images, in order to recognize the Moon and slap on the Moon texture on it (when there is no detail to recover in the first place, as in this experiment).

“This is not the same kind of processing that is done when you’re zooming into something else, when those multiple exposures and different data from each frame account to something. This is specific to the Moon.”

A previous investigation into Samsung’s Space Zoom feature on its Galaxy Ultra range of smartphones in 2021 drew similar conclusions about how the high definition results were achieved.

Input Mag conducted several tests to determine whether Samsung was using an image-recognition trick to “fake detailed moon photos”, with the tech giant claiming at the time that “the Scene Optimizer process is not overlaying any textures or adding fake images”.

Samsung has not replied to a request for comment from The Independent regarding the latest claims.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in