Rhodri Marsden: What does your wireless network say about you?
Cyberclinic
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.I've noticed that someone in my block of flats has treated themselves to a wireless router, because its name now features in the list of available access points from my computer. Normally I wouldn't think twice about this, except that it's labelled "COMMANDO", which either means its owner is interested in staging hit-and-run-style military manoeuvres, or they're not wearing underpants. Or both. And weirdly, they want me to know.
A wander through any residential area will reveal a bewildering array of service set identifiers, or SSIDs, the names we give to our wireless access points. These days many routers come out of the box with a unique but deeply boring name like "BTHomeHub-8DF4", but some instruction manuals still advise us to change the default SSID to something of our own, provoking a rich stream of human creativity. An enquiry on Twitter this week revealed that SSIDs seem to fall into one of seven categories – but which one is yours?
1. Those that reveal so much information (eg, "backbedroomFlat12") that they double as open invitations to thieving intruders, and may as well be named "I own a computer, help yourself."
2. Names like "Top Secret", "Keep Out" or "-_-_-_-_-" which, for bored local teenagers with elite hacking skills developed over late nights in front of a flickering screen, are nothing short of a red rag to a bull.
3. Ineffective sexual braggadocio, such as "lovemuffincutecute" or "HungLikeAHorse" – ineffective because it's not remotely clear who's actually doing the bragging.
4. The surreal or whimsical: "Hector's Hat", "The Giblets", "Drunk Guy Next Door".
5. The ones designed to cause slight unease amongst the local community, eg, "I watch you through a telescope", "PROVOS", "We Still Kill The Old Way", "Sleeping w/your husband".
6. Passive-aggressive choices that convey stern messages of disapproval, despite zero guarantee that they'll be seen by the guilty party, eg "Your dog is out of control", "We can hear you having sex", "Please no more music at 3am".
7. Where paranoia surrounding the possible use of an internet connection by a third party manifests itself in SSIDs like "Stay Off This Router" or "Don't Steal Our Internet You Basterds" (sic) – despite the fact that a more effective measure would be to simply change the password.
It's surprising that more people in the final category don't simply tick the box in their router settings that stops the SSID being broadcast, thus putting a stop to the vast majority of casual snooping. But if everyone did that, it would deprive us of a fascinating cultural phenomenon. Well, moderately interesting, anyway.
Email any technology gripes to cyberclinic@independent.co.uk
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments