Punctuation: Yahoo! attacks its own signs – and does a bad job

 

Tim Walker
Tuesday 18 September 2012 16:55 EDT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Marissa Meyer, the recently-appointed CEO of Yahoo!, this week posted a picture on Instagram of a discarded registered trademark symbol [®], ripped from a wall-mounted Yahoo! logo by one of her employees.

Apparently "bugged" by the symbol, said employee had "gone on a mission removing all the R's from our site and our campus".

All well and good, but there's an elephant in the room – or, to be more precise, an exclamation mark. Yahoo!'s name, you'll notice, still ends like a bad Broadway musical. In the punctuation-unfriendly age of the internet, it make sense for most businesses to do away with exclamation marks, question marks, apostrophes and ampersands in their online brand names, so why is a major web firm holding out?

Google, for example, had an exclamation mark in its original 1998 logo, but soon did away with it. And even more traditional businesses have bowed to the inevitable: while the consumer advice magazine Which? may retain its question mark, Waterstones removed its apostrophe in January, to much sadness in the grammarian community.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in