Pat Pilcher: New Zealand's file-sharing arms race commences
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.The battle between online file-sharers, governments and content providers looks set to intensify with the looming launch of Section 92a in New Zealand.
Under the new laws, ISPs will soon be charged with monitoring and administering the act, resulting in repeat copyright infringers being disconnected and potentially fined.
For file sharers ideologically opposed to the laws, effective digital counter-measures are set to rapidly become the order of the day.
Leading the charge has been bitorrent tracker site, thePirateBay.org, who have finally moved their IPREDATOR virtual private network (VPN) offering out of semi private beta, to make it available publicly.
Available on a subscription basis for 149 Swedish Kroners (approx £13 per 3 months), iPredator provides an encrypted link between subscribers and the internet which allows the user to "tunnel' data through iPredator servers.
The subscriber's IP address (which can be used for purposes of prosecution) remains hidden, revealing only a second IP address which is provided by iPredator.
Not only does iPredator stand to hinder monitoring agencies charged with tracking copyright infringing downloads from finding the identity of the individual's IP address, but it'll also force monitoring agencies to develop their own counter measures in order to effectively enforce Section 92a.
Whilst other pay-to-use VPNs already exist and offer similar levels of encryption and IP address security, ThePirateBay are hoping that iPredator's lack of data logging or retention of user details will provide them with a unique selling point.
Because of this, iPredator subscribers stand to theoretically be beyond reach of prosecution should the entertainment industry or law enforcement agencies obtain ThePirateBay's business records through legal means.
iPredator's move out of beta to a publicly available offering looks set to kick-start a digital arms race between file sharers and regulators as nimble private enterprises and individuals develop new measures to defeat monitoring agencies who will also be seeking to do likewise.
The key question however will be whether ISPs and monitoring agencies can move fast enough to develop appropriate enforcement capabilities. Should this not prove to be the case, section 92a could be rendered obsolete before it passes into law.
Source: NZ Herald
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments