Microsoft responds to Explorer antitrust accusations

Ap
Thursday 30 April 2009 05:53 EDT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Microsoft confirmed that it has submitted a formal response to European Union charges that tying the Internet Explorer browser to its Windows operating system violates antitrust rules.

The company can also seek a hearing before EU officials move toward a final decision that can fine a company up to 10 per cent of yearly global turnover or order it to change the way it does business.

EU regulators allege that adding Internet Explorer to Microsoft's ubiquitous desktop software was an "artificial distribution advantage which other web browsers are unable to match."

Internet Explorer is the world's most widely-used web browser, overshadowing Mozilla's Firefox, Google's Chrome and Apple's Safari.

Microsoft did not issue an official statement on its response to the charges but did say in January - when the EU filed the charge sheet - that it was committed to conducting its business in full compliance with European law.

The commission's investigation into Microsoft's web-surfing software began a year ago, after the Norwegian browser-maker Opera Software ASA filed a complaint, arguing that Microsoft hurt competitors not only by bundling the software, in effect giving away the browser, but also by not following accepted web standards.

That meant programmers who built web pages would have to tweak their codes for different browsers. In many cases, they simply designed pages that worked with market-leading Internet Explorer but showed up garbled on competing browsers.

Microsoft has touted its latest browser, Internet Explorer 8, as being fully compliant with web standards.

At the time of the complaint, Opera said it was asking EU regulators to either force Microsoft to market a version of Windows without the browser, or to include other browsers with Windows.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in