Instagram denies algorithm boosts photos of semi-nude men and women

Instagram’s algorithm is designed to prioritise photos of semi-nude men and women, according to a report from Algorithm Watch in partnership with the European Data Journalism Network.

But the company has suggested that the survey is misleading, and promised to give more information about how it decides what shows in the feed.

The researchers asked 26 volunteers to install a browser add-on and follow 37 professionals from 12 countries who use Instagram to advertise.

These advertisements range in topics, but focused on the food, travel, fitness, fashion, and beauty sectors.

The add-on automatically opened Instagram at random ties and checked which uploads appeared at the top of the feed in an attempt to get a better understanding of the company’s content recommendation system.

“If Instagram were not meddling with the algorithm, the diversity of posts in the newsfeed of users should match the diversity of the posts by the content creators they follow,” the report states.

However, it was found that of 1737 posts containing 2,400 photos, 21 percent were containing pictures showing “women in bikinis or underwear, or bare chested men.”

Those photos made up 30% of all posts shown from the same accounts. “Posts containing pictures of bare chested men were 28% more likely to be shown. By contrast, posts showing pictures of food or landscape were about 60% less likely to be shown in the newsfeed.”

Since Instagram’s guidelines state that nudity is not allowed on the service, the notion that the algorithm would favour revealing content is questionable.

Instagram, which is owned by Facebook, has since denied the research’s accuracy.

“There's been a recent study that suggests we boost content specifically because it contains semi-nudity. This is not true. We surface posts based on interests, timeliness of posts, and other factors to help people discover content most relevant to them” the company said.

“The study looked at an extremely small sample size, which likely surfaced the type of content they were researching: the more you engage with certain types of posts, the more likely we are to show you similar posts.”

“This research is flawed in a number of ways and shows a misunderstanding of how Instagram works. We will be releasing more information about what posts we do and don't recommend in the coming weeks” it concluded.

Instagram said recently that it was changing its algorithm in order to prevent the “shadowbanning” of black users and avoid systemic bias in its system.

Shadowbanning, Instagram says, is “filtering people without transparency, and limiting their reach as a result”.

Insight into social media companies’ algorithms has been something many people have been demanding for a variety of reasons.

In 2018, the US congress questioned Google CEO Sundar Pichai about why searching for the word “idiot” on Google Images show a whole host of pictures of Donald Trump.

Similarly, Twitter’s algorithm linked Mr Trump to the word “racist” in its search functionality.

Facebook was also recently criticised following a report that suggests the social media giant shelved research that would make its platform less polarising, a decision which, if made, was described as “antigrowth”.

Such algorithms can, theoretically, be gamed to promote certain content. Political subreddit r/the_donald, which is a space on Reddit for supporters of the president, repeatedly attempted to get its partisan posts to the homepage of the site or on its r/All subreddit.

These endeavours resulted in Reddit changing its algorithm to prevent all political content from reaching the front page.