Google tells popular music website to censor album cover art in 'sexually explicit content' ban

 

Adam Sherwin
Wednesday 09 July 2014 06:10 EDT
Comments
The Lambchop cover as it appeared on Drowned in Sound
The Lambchop cover as it appeared on Drowned in Sound

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

A leading music website has censored album covers by artists including Sigur Rós and Lambchop after they fell foul of a Google ban on “sexually explicit content”.

Drowned in Sound (DiS) was told that the covers, which include scenes of nudity, could no longer be shown on web pages which sit alongside Google’s advertising network.

The award winning website, which relies upon income from Google’s advertising exchange to help cover its server costs, has begun to cover up the offending artworks. DiS, which recorded 28.5 million page views last year, was told that it would be blocked from accessing Google’s advertising network within days if it failed to comply.

Sean Adams, who founded DiS in 2000, said that “it seems crazy that they feel they can police our editorial” and questioned whether Google might one day seek the removal of material which could seriously compromise freedom of expression.

The cover of Sigur Rós’ 2008 album, Med Sud I Eyrum Vid Spilum Endalaust, which features naked buttocks, incorporates an image by the acclaimed American photographer, Ryan McGinley.

Cheeky: the cover of Sigur Rós’ 2008 album, 'Med Sud I Eyrum Vid Spilum Endalaust'
Cheeky: the cover of Sigur Rós’ 2008 album, 'Med Sud I Eyrum Vid Spilum Endalaust'

Another offending cover, OH (Ohio) by Lambchop, features a painting called New Orleans Police Beating by Michael Peed. Its image of naked lovers is designed to contrast scenes of intimacy with violence outside.

Google said it could not comment on an individual case. A spokesman said: “Our policies for websites make clear that we will not serve ads to websites with adult or mature content. This policy has been in place for a long time and nothing has changed recently.”

The search engine is seeking to distance itself from the porn industry. The warning to DiS comes after Google sent a message to advertisers last month, notifying them that it will no longer accept adverts “that promote graphic depictions of sexual acts”.

This included content such as hardcore pornography and the depiction of masturbation and genital, anal and oral sexual acts.

The message read: “We ask that you make any necessary changes to your ads and sites to comply so that your campaigns can continue to run.”

The original, uncensored, cover for the Lambchop album 'OH (Ohio)'
The original, uncensored, cover for the Lambchop album 'OH (Ohio)'

The policy change relates to AdWords, Google’s advertising platform that places ads on Google sites as well as third-party websites that can use Google to make money.

It is likely to be a coincidence that publishers like Drowned in Sound received a notification asking them to remove explicit material.

Sites like Drowned in Sound, which use Google’s DoubleClick or AdSense advertising services, would only need to alter the code on their pages rather than self-censor their content.

But sources indicated that the search engine could examine whether its new policy was being applied too rigorously.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in