Google Penguin 3.0 released: anti-spam algorithim update confirmed
Don't worry - only SEO wranglers and online publishers are interested
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Google has officially released an update to its Penguin filter – a set of algorithms that weed out sites deemed to be spammy from its search results.
It’s the sixth release of Penguin to date and the first in over a year and is being designated Penguin 3.0 (releases only go up whole numbers when they have a significant impact on queries.
Penguin was first introduced in April 2012 to combat black-hat SEO: tactics used by unscrupulous marketers to trick Google into thinking their sites (often full of viruses or scams) are more authentic.
The update then will be only be of interest to publishers and search engine professionals in its full details but will doubtless affect the millions who use Google every hour of the day.
And as to the reactions of the pro’s it all seems a little hit and miss. SearchEngineJournal reports “strange data” as “some reporting stations are showing sharp inclines, some are showing sharp declines, and others aren’t showing much of a fluctuation at all.”
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments