Google blasted for listing ‘Nazism’ as belief of California Republicans
Google blames vandalism, but critics see more evidence of online bias
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Republicans blasted Google after the search engine briefly identified “Nazism” as one of the tenets of the California Republican party.
People searching for more information on the party were, for a time, greeted by a squib summarising information that included the word “Nazism” under an “ideology” section.
The characterisation quickly drew a backlash from conservatives. Rep Kevin McCarthy of Bakersfield, California’s highest-ranking Republican in Congress, tweeted that the term’s inclusion was a “disgrace”, adding a “#StoptheBias” hashtag.
“Google owes conservatives answers and assurances that they are putting an end to this”, Republican National Committee chairwoman Ronna McDaniel said.
Google said the misinformation did not come from “manual changes” made by one of its employees, faulting “vandalism” of a Wikipedia page that the search engine then picked up.
“We don't bias our search results toward any political party”, a Google spokesperson said in a statement, adding that “we have systems in place that catch vandalism before it impacts search results, but occasionally errors get through, and that's what happened here”.
Wikipedia said in a statement that volunteer editors corrected the lapse, adding that “when we learn about an error on Wikipedia, we’re grateful: it gives us an opportunity to correct the record”.
“Anyone can edit Wikipedia based on our core principles of neutrality and reliable sourcing, and hundreds of thousands of volunteers do this every month”, Wikipedia said.
But the episode seemed likely to bolster conservatives’ suspicion that technology companies - many of them headquartered in the liberal bastion of the San Francisco Bay area - are working to silence conservative thought online.
“Evidence is mounting that conservative voices are either being suppressed or, as it appears in this case, being falsely depicted as hateful extremists”, Ms McDaniel wrote.
A former engineer named James Damore has sued Google after losing his job for circulating a tract that questioned diversity initiatives and attributed unequal gender representation in the tech industry to biological differences.
He is being represented by Harmeet Dhillon, a prominent figure in the California Republican Party, whose law firm put out a call to other conservatives working in tech who felt they were being discriminated against for the political views.
Facebook has also battled allegations it downplays or censors conservative content. During a congressional hearing in April, multiple Republican legislators accused the company of bias.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments