UK to ditch EU privacy rules in post-Brexit push to trade data ‘like oil’
‘What Oliver Dowden really means is that he wants to use Brexit to take away our privacy and data rights,’ says campaign group
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.The UK government has unveiled a plan to scrap EU data protection rules as part of a post-Brexit privacy purge that would allow companies to sell customer data to foreign countries.
Culture Secretary Oliver Dowden said the UK would move away from the EU’s landmark GDPR privacy law and allow data to be treated like “oil”, describing the move as a multi-billion pound opportunity for corporations.
Privacy advocates were quick to condemn the announcement, with Open Rights Group describing it as an “assault on our privacy, fundamental rights and liberties” that have taken years to establish.
“What Oliver Dowden really means is that he wants to use Brexit to take away our privacy data rights,” the group tweeted on Thursday.
“We were told Brexit meant taking back control. But gutting our hard won data protection laws means we’ll lose control of our privacy.”
Cyber security experts also warned that the new measures could pose a risk to people’s online security if not handled correctly.
“The GDPR was introduced to safeguard citizen rights and privacy, helping to protect data, and while there are certainly always improvements that can be made, the government will need to be careful that these hard-won rights are not diluted when making changes,” Chris Waynforth from the cyber security firm Imperva, told The Independent.
“It’s already becoming harder and harder to guarantee data security... Unless changes take account of these risks, and organisations take action to protect increasingly vulnerable data, we could still find that the damage to privacy and security outweighs the benefits.”
Listed among the government’s “top priorities” for data partnerships are Australia, Colombia, South Korea, Singapore, the United Arab Emirates and United States of America.
The “longer term priorities” are Brazil, India, Indonesia and Kenya, building on more than £80 billion of data exports from the UK every year.
“Now that we have left the EU, I’m determined to seize the opportunity by developing a world-leading data policy that will deliver a Brexit dividend for individuals and businesses across the UK,” Culture Secretary Oliver Dowden said.
“That means seeking exciting new international data partnerships with some of the world’s fastest-growing economies, for the benefit of British firms and British customers alike. It means reforming our own data laws so that they’re based on common sense, not box-ticking.”
A government announcement said the move would make “data-enabled trade easier, quicker and safer” and “unlock the power of data to drive UK growth and innovation”.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments