Facebook finds sophisticated campaign to secretly affect midterm election results

It is not clear who the mysterious group is or what they were planning to do

Andrew Griffin
Tuesday 31 July 2018 13:43 EDT
Comments
Mark Zuckerberg hearing: 'It was my mistake. And I'm sorry.'

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Facebook has unearthed a sophisticated plot that could be trying to influence the upcoming US elections.

Dozens of fake accounts are apparently being used to try to influence the result of November’s US midterm elections, the company reported. It said it was in the “very early” stages of its investigation and did not know exactly what the secretive group were trying to do, or how they were planning to do it.

More than 30 Facebook and Instagram pages were shut down because they were suspected of being part of the campaign, Facebook said in a blog post, because they were “involved in coordinated inauthentic behaviour”.

“This kind of behaviour is not allowed on Facebook because we don’t want people or organisations creating networks of accounts to mislead others about who they are, or what they’re doing,” it wrote.

The announcement comes as Facebook continues to be criticised for failing to protect the public from the kind of fake posts and disinformation that were spread in advance of the 2016 US presidential election and which Facebook has connected to the Russian state.

The company does not know who was behind the co-ordinated attack, though it appears to be connected with protests planned in Washington next week.

The mysterious group uploaded nearly 10,000 posts and spent around $11,000 (£8,400) on adverts that ran across Facebook and Instagram. And it was planning to organise real events: a march against a far-right rally in Washington enlisted thousands of real supporters, and appeared to be expected to go ahead.

Whoever is behind the attack has gone to much more complex lengths to hide their identity than those involved in the previously reported work by the Russian Internet Research Agency (IRA), the company wrote.

They set up a whole range of different accounts – which together were followed by hundreds of thousands of people – which shared content under a range of different names. It is not clear what the group were planning to do with those popular accounts, some of which were explicitly political.

The most popular of the pages were named “Aztlan Warriors,” “Black Elevation,” “Mindful Being,” and “Resisters.”

An example of the pages that were run by the group
An example of the pages that were run by the group (Facebook)

Facebook first became aware of the strange behaviour when it spotted the first unusual accounts two weeks ago, said Nathaniel Gleicher, its head of cybersecurity policy. They have now all been removed.

It said that finding the identities of the people behind the pages had been made more difficult because of security updates that Facebook has made over the last year, when the company has been repeatedly criticised for not doing enough to stop its platform being used to manipulate elections.

As such, Facebook might never be able to say where the attack was coming from, said Alex Stamos, Facebook’s chief security officer.

“The set of actors we see now might be the IRA with improved capabilities, or it could be a separate group,” he wrote in a blog post. “This is one of the fundamental limitations of attribution: offensive organisations improve their techniques once they have been uncovered, and it is wishful thinking to believe that we will always be able to identify persistent actors with high confidence.”

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in