Facebook denies publishing private messages, but share prices plummet regardless

 

Kevin Rawlinson
Tuesday 25 September 2012 13:32 EDT
Comments
The company's insistence it has done nothing wrong could not spare its share price, which fell more than 9 nine per cent amid the rumours at the close of trading yesterday.
The company's insistence it has done nothing wrong could not spare its share price, which fell more than 9 nine per cent amid the rumours at the close of trading yesterday. (Getty Images)

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Facebook has denied claims that a bug on the site is publishing users' private messages, saying they were originally posted by users voluntarily.

But the company's insistence it has done nothing wrong could not spare its share price, which fell more than 9 nine per cent amid the rumours at the close of trading yesterday.

Reports began to surface yesterday of some claiming that private messages they sent to other people on the site between 2007 and 2009 were reappearing as posts visible to all of their friends. The allegations were first reported in the French newspaper Metro France and were quickly seized upon by technology blogs and newspapers.

Facebook confirmed last night that the rumours were false but users' fears appear to have already spread to investors as the company's stock slumped 9.06 per cent on the New York stock exchange, its worst fall since June.

After readers of technology websites began writing in, claiming they were seeing a similar problem, concerns were raised of a highly damaging privacy breach at Facebook.

The leading blog The Next Web reported a host of readers' complaints from across the world that the problem was affecting them. Readers said it was happening in the UK, in the Philippines and in Canada. One of the blog's reporters in France also said she was experiencing the problem.

A later update to the story claimed: “Reports are coming in from readers all over the world saying private messages have appeared on their Timeline,” although the blog warned readers to be wary of the difference between messages posted publicly and those posted privately in the past.

After an internal investigation into the claims, Facebook confirmed that old messages were reappearing but said that they were in fact posts the users themselves had originally published to their friends, rather than private messages.

A spokesman said: “A small number of users raised concerns after what they mistakenly believed to be private messages appeared on their Timeline. Our engineers investigated these reports and found that the messages were older wall posts that had always been visible on the users' profile pages. Facebook is satisfied that there has been no breach of user privacy.”

And the spokesman told TechCrunch: “Every report we've seen, we've gone back and checked. We haven't seen one report that's been confirmed. A lot of the confusion is because before 2008 there were no likes and no comments on wall posts. People went back and forth with wall posts instead of having a conversation.”

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in