Facebook fights Cambridge Analytica fine imposed by data watchdog
The £500,000 fine is just 0.001 per cent of Facebook's annual revenue
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Facebook has appealed a fine imposed by the UK data watchdog following the Cambridge Analytica scandal.
The Information Commissioner's Office (ICO) handed a £500,000 fine – the maximum penalty possible – for what it said amounted to a failure to protect UK Facebook users.
It was originally reported that the personal information of 87 million Facebook users was compromised by a personality quiz app that shared data with Cambridge Analytica for the purpose of political profiling in 2016. Roughly 1.1 million of those affected were said to be based in the UK.
However a subsequent investigation by the ICO found no evidence that UK-based Facebook users were affected.
A fine was still imposed on the technology giant for failing to adequately protect the data of UK users.
"The ICO's investigation stemmed from concerns that UK citizens' data may have been impacted by Cambridge Analytica, yet they now have confirmed that they have found no evidence to suggest that information of Facebook users in the UK was ever shared by Dr Kogan with Cambridge Analytica, or used by its affiliates in the Brexit referendum," Facebook's lawyer Anna Benckert said in a statement.
"Therefore, the core of the ICO's argument no longer relates to the events involving Cambridge Analytica. Instead, their reasoning challenges some of the basic principles of how people should be allowed to share information online, with implications which go far beyond just Facebook, which is why we have chosen to appeal.
"For example, under the ICO's theory people should not be allowed to forward an email or message without having agreement from each person on the original thread.
"These are things done by millions of people every day on services across the internet, which is why we believe the ICO's decision raises important questions of principle for everyone online which should be considered by an impartial court based on all the relevant evidence."
Facebook's legal challenge will be reviewed by a General Regulatory Chamber tribunal.
"Any organisation issued with a monetary penalty notice by the Information Commissioner has the right to appeal the decision to the First-tier Tribunal," said a spokesman for the ICO.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments