European Court rules that it is not a breach of privacy to read messages — but bosses could snoop on pretty much everything you do already
As long as you have been informed that your communications will be monitored, which is probably in your contract, then it’s almost always possible for your boss to do so
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.A European court ruling has made clear that bosses can spy on their employees. But the ruling really just points out the wide range of the current law — which allows bosses to spy on their employers in almost every circumstance.
The ruling revolved around a Romanian engineer who was fired after his boss looked in on Yahoo Messenger conversations and saw that he had been using it to communicate with his fiancée and brother. It found that the engineer couldn’t appeal under the European Convention on Human Rights and that his right to privacy wasn’t infringed.
The ruling confirms once again that bosses have huge powers to snoop on the conversations of their employees — whether or not they have anything to do with work.
So long as the monitoring is related to the business, the equipment being used is provided for work and the employer has told workers that their communications could be monitored, employers are able legally to look in on conversations.
The Citizens’ Advice Bureau makes clear that the limits aren’t really very limiting at all. The allowed circumstances cover “almost every situation where your employer might want to monitor your electronic communications, except where the monitoring is for purely private or spiteful reasons almost every situation where your employer might want to monitor your electronic communications, except where the monitoring is for purely private or spiteful reasons”, it writes.
The monitoring must happen for one of a long list of reasons for it to be lawful. But that includes broad things like checking that work is being done properly and that people aren’t using computers or the internet for their own purposes.
Bosses aren’t allowed to monitor people at work in secret, by using things like hidden cameras, in all but a very limited number of cases. Data protection law says that such monitoring should only ever happen in the case of serious crime, like drug dealing in toilets.
The rules on monitoring are usually written in an employees’ contract. That will usually make clear that communications could be intercepted and that workers might be punished depending on what is found there.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments