Employers who Facebook stalk could be missing out on the best employees
A new study has found that people who post photos of themselves partying could still be good employees
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Nosey potential employers who reject job candidates after seeing them in rowdy party photos on social media may be taking the wrong approach.
A new study that indicates this underhand recruitment tactic could harm employers may be welcome news to paranoid jobseekers who feel the need to constantly vet their profiles for photos of them swigging wine, or worse.
Researchers at North Carolina State University tested the activity of 175 Facebook users, and compared this with whether they had desirable personality traits that employers want, including conscientiousness, being agreeable, and being an extrovert.
The study also examined how job seekers react to the popular screening practice which sees employees scouting social media for evidence of ‘undesirable’ habits such as drinking and taking drugs to help them reject candidates.
NCSU professor of psychology Lori Foster Thompson said that companies using taking this approach to their recruitment process were missing a trick.
“We found that there is no significant correlation between conscientiousness and an individual’s willingness to post content on Facebook about alcohol or drug use,” she said.
Lead author of the study published in the 'Journal of Business and Pyshcology', Will Stoughton, added: “[The practice] means companies are eliminating some conscientious job applicants based on erroneous assumptions regarding what social media behaviour tells us about the applicants.”
The study also found that employees may be damaging their reputation by Facebook 'stalking'. Psychologists discovered that if a job seeker’s suspicion is piqued by odd friend requests, or rumours are spread about a company’s unofficial recruitment tactics, employees are less likely to perceive the hiring process as unfair and are more inclined to resort to legal action.
Professor Thompson said of the process: “When you think about the fact that top talent usually has a lot of choices as to where they want to go to work, it begins to really matter.”
The practice could signal serious implications for employees. According to a 2013 survey by the UK Institute for Employment Studies, almost half of all companies reported that they use social media profiles to make hiring decisions.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments