Court documents reveal Diddy invested in X in the Elon Musk era
Investors in platform that Tesla CEO bought for $44bn in 2022 include Silicon Valley venture capital firms and fund linked to Sean ‘Diddy’ Combs
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.A detailed list of investors in Elon Musk’s X platform has been unsealed in federal court.
The backers of the platform, which Musk purchased for $44bn in 2022, include some familiar names, like venture capital firms Andreessen Horowitz and 8VC; Twitter founder and former CEO Jack Dorsey; and funds tied to Fidelity.
Others investors come from the worlds of politics and entertainment, including Saudi Prince Alwaleed bin Talal al Saud and a fund linked to music mogul Sean “Diddy” Combs.
The revelations came Tuesday in a San Francisco federal court in response to a motion from technology journalist Jacob Silverman and the Reporters Commitee for Freedom of the Press.
They sought to unseal the investor list, which was part of a 2023 lawsuit from former Twitter employees alleging Musk violated their arbitration agreements when he purchased the company.
“I believe that people have a right to know who owns a company with such a prominent role in shaping public discourse, both in the United States and around the world,” Silverman wrote on his website. “X’s self-proclaimed role as a guarantor of free speech means that we should know which outside entities — and which foreign governments — may be able to exert influence on the company.”
In a statement to The Washington Post, Reporters Committee legal director Katie Townsend said it was in “the interest of the general public in knowing who owns X.”
The Independent has contacted X for comment.
X has been no stranger to legal drama lately.
Earlier this month, it filed an antitrust lawsuit against an industry group representing numerous global brands, including the social network’s own advertisers, accusing it of conspiring to deprive X of billions of dollars.
The lawsuit prompted the Global Alliance for Responsible Media to shut down.
“GARM is a small, not-for-profit initiative, and recent allegations that unfortunately misconstrue its purpose and activities have caused a distraction and significantly drained its resources and finances,” the group said in a statement to DEADLINE. “WFA therefore is making the difficult decision to discontinue GARM activities.”
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments