Elon Musk lawyer urges judge to delay Twitter trial over whistleblower concerns: ‘Doesn’t justice demand it?’
‘Doesn’t justice demand a few weeks to look into this?’ Musk’s lawyer asks
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Elon Musk’s lawyer has told a judge that the Tesla chief’s Twitter trial should be delayed due to concerns over claims made by a whistleblower on security issues with the social media platform.
In July, a judge had announced that the trial between the world’s richest man and the social media company would take place in the Delaware Court of Chancery for five days between 17 and 21 October.
But Mr Musk’s lawyer Alex Spiro said on Tuesday that the trial should be delayed by several weeks to allow the Tesla chief to investigate the whistleblower’s claims on Twitter’s security issues.
“Doesn’t justice demand a few weeks to look into this?” Mr Spiro reportedly said at a hearing in Wilmington, Delaware.
In August, Twitter’s former security head Peiter “Mudge” Zatko became a whistleblower and submitted a string of allegations to US regulatory agencies about repeated security violations by his former employer.
He said the social media company was not honest about its privacy issues and data security, adding that the microblogging platform has been subject to major breaches by foreign governments.
Mr Zatko also claimed Twitter has not been honest about the number of fake accounts on the platform, which was in line with the Tesla titan’s consistent allegations that the social media company undercounts its spam “bot” accounts.
Mr Musk has repeatedly cited Twitter’s bot “problem” as the reason for not going through with the deal to buy the company.
“If Twitter simply provides their method of sampling 100 accounts and how they’re confirmed to be real, the deal should proceed on original terms. However, if it turns out that their SEC filings are materially false, then it should not,” the multibillionaire had tweeted last month.
“I hereby challenge [Twitter chief executive Parag Agrawal] to a public debate about the Twitter bot percentage. Let him prove to the public that Twitter has <5% fake or spam daily users!” he had said.
Twitter had dismissed Mr Zatko’s allegations, calling them a “false narrative.”
The company’s lawyers reportedly accused the Tesla chief on Tuesday of using the whistleblower’s claims to cover up the fact that he supposedly hurried to buy the social media platform without adequate risk assessment.
“Mr Musk is blaming Twitter for his failing to do customary due diligence,” William Savitt, an attorney for Twitter, said, according to Reuters.
Mr Savitt urged the judge to prevent the Tesla chief from adding whistleblower claims to his lawsuit and, if allowed, to begin the trial as scheduled on 17 October.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments