Donald Trump blocking critics on Twitter may violate constitutional right to free speech
Federal judge to rule on whether President silencing online adversaries who attack or mock him breaches First Amendment
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.A New York federal judge has been tasked with ruling on whether President Donald Trump blocking hostile commentators on Twitter is a violation of their constitutional right to free speech.
Senior Judge Naomi Reice Buchwald, of the US District Court for the Southern District of New York in Manhattan, is currently engaged in a hearing to consider Trump's request that a lawsuit brought against him last July by the Knight First Amendment Institute at Columbia University be dismissed.
US citizens' right to free speech is enshrined in the First Amendment and the President refusing to hear their views, however unfavourable, is fundamentally undemocratic, the institute argues.
Judge Buchwald put it to Trump's lawyer Michael Baer that Twitter was the equivalent of a town hall meeting where political representatives would be unable to pull the plug on a microphone held by an unsympathetic audience member, no matter how unpalatable their views.
"Once it is a public forum, you can't shut somebody up because you don't like what they're saying," she said.
Baer disagreed with her analogy and argued that a closer parallel was the President walking away from a hostile crowd at a public gathering.
"The President has an associational interest in deciding who he's going to spend his time with in that setting," Baer said.
Trump's use of Twitter has been a never-ending source of controversy since his campaign days and the pace has hardly let up since he took office.
From retweeting violent Islamophobic videos by far-right political factions to duelling with North Korean leader Kim Jong-un over who has the larger nuclear button, Trump's use of Twitter has exhausted the world.
He's tanked the share prices of Boeing, Lockheed Martin and Toyota, criticised his own attorney-general, promoted his daughter's clothing line, harangued Saturday Night Live for impersonating him, perplexed one and all with "covfefe" and branded Meryl Streep an "overrated actress".
The number of accounts and individuals the President has blocked is vast, including members of the public who have gently chided him, veterans' organisations and outspoken celebrity opponents from Chrissy Teigen to Stephen King.
It is not yet known when Buchwald will make her final ruling on the matter.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments