Crypto energy demands drop by country-sized amount following Ethereum Merge, study reveals
Reduction in demand is equivalent to electrical power requirement of a country like Ireland or Austria
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.The energy demands of cryptocurrency have dropped by a country-sized amount following a change to the underlying technology of Ethereum, according to a new study.
The world’s second largest cryptocurrency underwent a transition dubbed ‘The Merge’ in September, which commentators at the time described as “the most consequential event in crypto history” after the creation of bitcoin.
It involved a switch from a proof-of-work (PoW) to a proof-of-stake (PoS) network, meaning vast computing power was no longer needed to validate transactions or mint new units of Ethereum’s ETH token.
Estimations suggested it would reduce Ethereum’s electricity consumption by more than 99 per cent, which has now been confirmed by a study released in the data-science journal Patterns on Tuesday.
”In absolute terms, the reduction in power demand could be equivalent to the electrical power requirement of a country such as Ireland or even Austria,” the study noted.
The reduction in power demand for Ethereum’s network may not reverberate globally, however, as the computing devices used to mine ETH could still be repurposed to mine other cryptocurrencies still using PoW – so long as demand for these cryptocurrencies remains high.
“If crypto consumers were sufficiently concerned, they would probably avoid buying bitcoin and, previously, Ethereum,” said study author and crypto economist Alex De Vries said.
“But just last year these crypto assets were still hitting all-time highs, even though there is no shortage of news coverage on their climate impacts.”
Bitcoin advocates have so far been reluctant to impose a similar change for the world’s leading cryptocurrency, as they claim it moves away from its core principle of decentralisation.
This could potentially change if there is significant pressure from regulators, with the White House Office of Science and Technology Policy releasing a report in September recommending a shift towards environmentally responsible cryptocurrency technologies.
“This is being discussed at the highest levels of government. Regulation would be helpful in getting the community to reconsider its current stance,” Mr De Vries said.
“The bitcoin community has been very anti-change, but the Ethereum community has shown that despite concerns and resistance it is possible to make the necessary changes on a live blockchain, which means that the bitcoin community may need a little bit of a nudge from the outside to actually make these things happen.”
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments