Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Google faces a new controversy in China after a website run by the Communist Party's main newspaper accused the US search giant of trying to keep internet users away following its reports on a copyright dispute.
The online People's Daily book section said the three-day disruption began last Wednesday after it reported on a Chinese group's complaint that Google's plan for an online library of digitised books might violate Chinese authors' copyrights.
Google searches returned a warning that the site might contain software that could harm computers, said Pan Jian, the section's manager.
"We got complaints from readers that they couldn't access our channel via Google," Pan said. "We thought it might be related to our reporting on the conflict between Google Library and Chinese authors."
An unidentified People's Daily official quoted on the paper's website said the section was "maliciously blocked by Google."
A Google spokeswoman, Cui Jin, denied the warning was prompted by the site's reporting on the copyright dispute."This is absolutely incorrect," Cui said. She said the warning was generated by software that is "an automatic function without any human interference."
Pan said his site's technicians found nothing wrong. He said the Chinese search engine Baidu did not return a similar warning, but Cui said that might be because Baidu does not use the same screening software.
The software was produced by StopBadware.org, an industry group that promotes internet security, Cui said. The group's website says it is coordinated by Harvard University's Berkman Center for Internet & Society and supported by companies such as Google, PayPal, Mozilla, AOL and Trend Micro.
Google, based in Mountain View, California, has faced other complaints about its operations in China, where the government uses an extensive filtering system to try to block access to material deemed lewd or subversive.
In June, Beijing accused Google of allowing access to pornography. That followed an unexplained outage that temporarily blocked users in China from seeing Google's US site, its China-based site google.cn and its Gmail email service.
Google has struggled to expand in China, where it has less than 30 per cent of the search market, versus more than 60 per cent for local rival Baidu.
China has more than 338 million internet users, a group bigger than the entire US population.
In the copyright dispute, the China Written Works Copyright Society called on Google last week to negotiate compensation for Chinese authors.
Google has reached a tentative agreement to compensate US authors and publishers. It applies only to the United States, but Google said it is encouraging rightsholders abroad to register for the settlement.
Baidu also has faced complaints about its operations.
Last November, it was accused by a state television news program of allowing unlicensed sellers of medical products to pay for better placement in search results without informing users.
Baidu launched a review of whether advertisers had required licenses and said it dropped links to some merchants.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments