Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.AOL plans to find a buyer for its social networking site Bebo, for which it paid $850 million (£558 million) in 2008, or shut it down.
The level of competition in social networking makes it difficult for the company to fight larger players such as Facebook and News Corp's MySpace, AOL said.
The company plans to decide whether to close Bebo or sell it by the end of May, it told staff on Tuesday.
"Bebo, unfortunately, is a business that has been declining and, as a result, would require significant investment in order to compete in the competitive social networking space," the company said in a memo sent to staff.
AOL, which was spun off from Time Warner Inc in December, said it is not in a position to "further fund and support Bebo in pursuing a turnaround in social networking."
The company said it is committed to finding interested potential buyers for Bebo. Bebo has about 40 employees, mostly in the United States.
Bebo, founded in San Francisco, is one of the most popular social networking sites in the UK, but never gained traction in the United States.
AOL paid $850 million (£558 million) for the company in March 2008 as the internet company, then part of Time Warner, tried to latch on to the coattails of the social networking craze.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments