Apple sued over broken iPhones by Australia after 'Error 53' controversy
The Apple update meant that people who had their phone screens fixed found them breaking without warning
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Apple is being sued by Australia, after its phones started breaking with no warning.
A new case from the country’s consumer watchdog accuses the company of “bricking”, or remotely disabling, phones with a software update. That follows the controversy over what was dubbed “Error 53” – named after the message that was displayed after the update arrived and wouldn’t allow people to use their phone.
Specifically, the problem arose when people had their screens fixed by a non-Apple repairer. That triggered what Apple said was a security measure, but others complained was an unfair change, which meant that the phones wouldn’t turn back on and couldn’t be fixed again by Apple.
The Australian Competition and Consumer Commission said the change, which stopped people from using their phones at all, was unfair. It drew attention to the fact that Apple told customers that it wasn’t required to, and wouldn’t, provide a fix for the problem.
“Consumer guarantee rights under the Australian Consumer Law exist independently of any manufacturer’s warranty and are not extinguished simply because a consumer has goods repaired by a third party,” ACCC chairman Rod Sims said.
Apple had been engaged in “misleading or deceptive conduct and made false or misleading representations to consumers”, the ACCC’s court filings read. As such, it asked for injunctions, declarations, compliance programme orders, corrective notices, and costs as well as fines.
The filing came just a week after the watchdog ruled in favour of Apple’s by denying Australian banks the ability to launch their own rival to Apple’s Wallet app, which allows people to pay for things with their phone.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments